Clinical validation of S100B in the management of a mild traumatic brain injury: issues from an interventional cohort of 1449 adult patients
- PMID: 29924734
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0471
Clinical validation of S100B in the management of a mild traumatic brain injury: issues from an interventional cohort of 1449 adult patients
Abstract
Background: This study's primary objective was to validate the routine use of S100B via a prospective study. The aim was a reduction of cranial computed tomography (CCT) scans by 30%. The secondary goal was to investigate the influence of age and associated risk factors on the reduction of CCT.
Methods: S100B (sampling within 3 h postinjury) was used for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBIs) presenting a medium risk of complications and requiring a CCT scan. Patients with negative S100B (S100B-) were discharged without a CCT scan.
Results: Of the 1449 patients included in this study, 468 (32.3%) had S100B- with a sensitivity of 96.4% (95% CI: 87.5%-99.6%), a specificity of 33.4% (95% CI: 31%-36%) and a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI: 98.5%-99.9%). No significant difference in serum levels or the S100B+ rate was observed if patients had retrograde amnesia (0.16 μg/L; 63.8%), loss of consciousness (0.13; 63.6%) or antiplatelet therapy (0.20; 77.9%). Significant differences were found between the S100B concentrations and S100B positivity rates in patients >65 years old and all the groups with patients <55 years old (18-25, 26-35, 36-45 and 46-55). From 18 to 65 years old (n=874), the specificity is 39.3% (95% CI: 36%-42.6%) compared to 18.7% (95% CI: 15.3%-22.3%) for patients >65 years old (n=504).
Conclusions: The clinical use of S100B in mTBI management reduces the use of CCTs by approximately one-third; furthermore, the percentage of CCTs reduction is influenced by the age of the patient.
Keywords: S100B; mTBI; mild traumatic brain injury.
References
-
- Tazarourte K, Macaine C, Didane H, Dékadjevi H. Traumatisme crânien non grave. EMC – Médecine Urgence [Internet]. (25-200-C–10). http://www.em-consulte.com/en/article/61647. Assessed: 18 May 2017. [cited 14 Aug 2017].
-
- Tiret L, Garros B, Maurette P, Nicaud V, Thicoipe M, Hatton F, et al. Incidence, causes and severity of injuries in Aquitaine, France: a community-based study of hospital admissions and deaths. Am J Public Health 1989;79:316–21.
-
- Jehlé E, Honnart D, Grasleguen C, Bouget J, Dejoux C, Lestavel P, et al. Traumatisme crânien léger (score de Glasgow de 13 à 15) : triage, évaluation, examens complémentaires et prise en charge précoce chez le nouveau-né, l’enfant et l’adulte : Société française de médecine d’urgence. Ann Fr Médecine Urgence 2012;2:199–214.
-
- Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1391–6.
-
- Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100–5.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous