Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7260-7265.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800098115. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Cellulose crystals plastify by localized shear

Affiliations

Cellulose crystals plastify by localized shear

Gergely Molnár et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Cellulose microfibrils are the principal structural building blocks of wood and plants. Their crystalline domains provide outstanding mechanical properties. Cellulose microfibrils have thus a remarkable potential as eco-friendly fibrous reinforcements for structural engineered materials. However, the elastoplastic properties of cellulose crystals remain poorly understood. Here, we use atomistic simulations to determine the plastic shear resistance of cellulose crystals and analyze the underpinning atomic deformation mechanisms. In particular, we demonstrate how the complex and adaptable atomic structure of crystalline cellulose controls its anisotropic elastoplastic behavior. For perfect crystals, we show that shear occurs through localized bands along with noticeable dilatancy. Depending on the shear direction, not only noncovalent interactions between cellulose chains but also local deformations, translations, and rotations of the cellulose macromolecules contribute to the response of the crystal. We also reveal the marked effect of crystalline defects like dislocations, which decrease both the yield strength and the dilatancy, in a way analogous to that of metallic crystals.

Keywords: crystalline cellulose; dislocations; molecular mechanics simulation; nanoscale plasticity; shear bands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Atomic structure of Iβ cellulose. From Left to Right, molecular chains are shown in the xy (A), xz (B), and yz (C) planes. The direction of the applied shear strain is shown in each case. D is a 3D geometrical volume fitted on the cellulose chains to highlight their corrugation. Three-dimensional interactive representations are shown in SI Appendix, Figs. S2 and S3. (The hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms are not shown here.)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Shear deformation in different planes. (A–C) Shear stress–strain curves in the xy, xz, and yz planes. (D–F) Corresponding axial strains. Atomic-scale deformation mechanisms are shown in Movies S1–S3. In A and B, Insets, the local coarse-grained shear strain is shown just after the first plastic event.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Evolution of chain tilt angles in the xy plane as a function of shear strain (A) and corresponding forward and reverse stress/strain curves (B). Atomic-scale deformation is shown in Movie S4.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Relative position of the corrugated cellulose chains during shear in the xz plane. The blue and black curves show the distance in the z direction between a reference carbon atom in an upper chain, C3T, and two carbon atoms, C3i with i=1,2 in a lower chain. The stress–strain curve is in red. Molecular-level deformation is shown in Movie S5.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
(A) Coarse-grained shear strain map in projection perpendicular to the shear direction (in the xy plane) with a 3D sketch of the molecular structure and orientation of the applied shear strain. (B) O5-C5-C6-O6 dihedral angles of the chains shown in C and D in the shear band as a function of applied deformation. (C and D) Local atomic structure before (C) and after (D) the first large stress drop.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Shear in the xz plane in the presence of two edge dislocations forming a dipole. A schematic representation of the dislocated crystal is shown in A, and details of the molecular structure near and far from a dislocation core are shown in B. The resulting stress–strain curve is compared with that of a perfect crystal in C.

Comment in

References

    1. Fernandes AN, et al. Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E1195–E1203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:3941–3994. - PubMed
    1. Dufresne A, editor. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials. 2nd Ed Walter de Gruyter; Berlin: 2018.
    1. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund L, Isogai A. An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: The strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:248–253. - PubMed
    1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87:963–979.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources