Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;45(11):837-844.
doi: 10.1111/joor.12663. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

Affiliations

International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

F Lobbezoo et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

In 2013, consensus was obtained on a definition of bruxism as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterised by clenching or grinding of the teeth and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible and specified as either sleep bruxism or awake bruxism. In addition, a grading system was proposed to determine the likelihood that a certain assessment of bruxism actually yields a valid outcome. This study discusses the need for an updated consensus and has the following aims: (i) to further clarify the 2013 definition and to develop separate definitions for sleep and awake bruxism; (ii) to determine whether bruxism is a disorder rather than a behaviour that can be a risk factor for certain clinical conditions; (iii) to re-examine the 2013 grading system; and (iv) to develop a research agenda. It was concluded that: (i) sleep and awake bruxism are masticatory muscle activities that occur during sleep (characterised as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterised by repetitive or sustained tooth contact and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively; (ii) in otherwise healthy individuals, bruxism should not be considered as a disorder, but rather as a behaviour that can be a risk (and/or protective) factor for certain clinical consequences; (iii) both non-instrumental approaches (notably self-report) and instrumental approaches (notably electromyography) can be employed to assess bruxism; and (iv) standard cut-off points for establishing the presence or absence of bruxism should not be used in otherwise healthy individuals; rather, bruxism-related masticatory muscle activities should be assessed in the behaviour's continuum.

Keywords: assessment; awake bruxism; bruxism; clinical inspection; cut-off points; definition; electromyography; polysomnography; self-report; sleep bruxism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus.
    Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, de Leeuw R, Manfredini D, Svensson P, Winocur E. Lobbezoo F, et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/joor.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 4. J Oral Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 23121262
  • J Oral Rehabil.

References

    1. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:2–4. - PubMed
    1. De Leeuw LR, Klasser GD. Orofacial Pain. Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management, 5th edn. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.; 2013.
    1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edn. Westchester, NY: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014:303–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raphael KG, Santiago V, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a disorder or a behavior? Rethinking the international consensus on defining and grading of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2016a;43:791–798. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manfredini D, De Laat A, Winocur E, Ahlberg J. Why not stop looking at bruxism as a black/white condition? Aetiology could be unrelated to clinical consequences. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:799–801. - PubMed