Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Aug;37(8):775-781.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000630. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

How prescriptive support affects weight loss in weight-loss intervention participants and their untreated spouses

Talea Cornelius  1 , Katelyn Gettens  2 , Erin Lenz  2 , Alexis C Wojtanowski  3 , Gary D Foster  3 , Amy A Gorin  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

How prescriptive support affects weight loss in weight-loss intervention participants and their untreated spouses

Talea Cornelius et al. Health Psychol. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Controlling or prescriptive support styles (e.g., pressure) often hinder weight loss, but can sometimes be beneficial. This secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial examined persuasion, pressure, and indirect social control among cohabiting couples and the effect of these supports on weight loss.

Methods: Couples (NCouples = 130) were randomized to either Weight Watchers (WW) or a self-guided control condition (SG). Only one member of each couple received the intervention; the other member of the couple was untreated. Couples were weighed and completed study measures at baseline, 3, and 6 months.

Results: Dyadic multilevel models examined BMI change and differences across role (treated participant/untreated spouse) and condition (WW/SG). Prescriptive support predicted BMI change for treated participants in the WW condition only. For treated WW participants, there was no significant decrease in BMI when pressure was high (+1SD), B = -.25, p = .22, but a significant decrease when pressure was low (0), B = -.96, p < .001. Additionally, high levels of indirect social control (+1SD) predicted greater decreases in BMI compared to low (-1SD) indirect social control, B = -.91, p < .001, and, B = -.41, p < .01.

Conclusions: Considering both the type and context of support for weight management is worthwhile. Intervention participants had access to treatment resources that may have engendered more effective responses to spouses' concerns or a sense of obligation to their spouse (indirect social control), whereas pressures to lose weight-while engaged in treatment-may have undermined behavior-change efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change in BMI for treated participants in the intervention condition at low (−1SD) and high (+1SD) indirect social control.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change in BMI for treated participants in the intervention condition at low (0) and high (+1SD) pressure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brewis AA (2014). Stigma and the perpetuation of obesity. Social Science & Medicine, 118, 152–158. - PubMed
    1. Brunson JA, Overup CS, Nguyen ML, Novak SA, & Smith V (2014). Good intentions gone awry? Effects of weight-related social control on health and well-being. Body Image, 11(1), 1–10. - PubMed
    1. Christakis NA, & Fowler JH (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370–379. - PubMed
    1. Cornelius T, Gettens K, & Gorin AA (2016). Dyadic dynamics in a randomized weight loss intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deci EL, & Ryan RM (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185.

Publication types