Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 12:9:433-441.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S142947. eCollection 2018.

Face-to-face versus online training for the interpretation of findings in the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow procedure

Susan L Brady  1 , Noel Rao  2 , Patricia J Gibbons  3 , Letha Williams  4 , Mark Hakel  5 , Theresa Pape  6
Affiliations

Face-to-face versus online training for the interpretation of findings in the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow procedure

Susan L Brady et al. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an online, interdisciplinary, interactive course designed to increase the ability to accurately interpret the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow (FEES) procedure to traditional, face-to-face (F2F) lectures for both graduate medical education (GME) and graduate speech language pathology (GSLP) programs.

Design: This was a prospective, quantitative, nonrandomized study. Participants were medical residents in physical medicine and rehabilitation from two affiliated programs and graduate students in speech language pathology from two instructional cohorts at a single institution. Group 1, traditional group (n=51), participated in F2F lectures using an audience response system, whereas Group 2, online group (n=57), participated in an online, interactive course. The main outcome measure was pre- and post-course FEES knowledge test scores.

Results: For Group 1, the mean pre-course score was 26.94 (SD=3.24) and the post-course score was 34.96 (SD=2.51). Differences between pre- and post-course scores for Group 1 were significant (t=-16.38, P≤0.0001). For Group 2, the mean pre-course score was 27.05 (SD=2.74) and the post-course score was 34.05 (SD=2.84). Differences between pre- and post-course scores for Group 2 were significant (t=-13.5, P≤0.0001). The mean knowledge change score for Group 1 and Group 2 was 8.01 (SD=3.50) and 7.04 (SD=3.91), respectively (nonsignificant, t=1.372, P=0.173), suggesting groups made similar gains.

Conclusion: Incorporating technology into GME and GSLP programs yielded comparable gains to traditional lectures. Findings support the use of online education as a viable alternative to the traditional F2F classroom format for the instruction of the cognitive component of the FEES procedure.

Keywords: deglutition; dysphagia; endoscopy; medical education; swallowing; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Role of the speech-language pathologist in the performance and interpretation of endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: guidelines. 2004. [Accessed June 29, 2017]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):623–649.
    1. Benadom EM, Potter NL. The use of simulation in training graduate students to perform transnasal endoscopy. Dysphagia. 2011;26(4):352–360. - PubMed
    1. Boone HN, Boone DA. Analyzing Likert data. J Ext. 2012;50(2):1–5.
    1. Brady S, Donzelli J. The modified barium swallow (MBS) and the functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(6):1009–1022. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources