Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;13(4):e95-e102.
doi: 10.1183/20734735.013717.

Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner

Affiliations

Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner

Frank W J M Smeenk et al. Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec.

Abstract

In 2014, a group of physicians of the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven (The Netherlands) started a project called "Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner". Just like others in the country, the Eindhoven group noticed that regularly, very frail elderly people were admitted to hospital in acute situations without there ever having been conversations about their wishes concerning treatment options at the end of life. The project aimed to prevent unnecessary admissions and treatments for these frail patients by stimulating physicians, patients and informal caregivers to start conversations about end-of-life care together at an earlier stage. The first phase of the project consisted of research: a study of the relevant literature on previous projects on the matter and a small empirical study in the Eindhoven region. This yielded as the most important causes of the delay of these conversations: the factors of timing (when is the right moment?), reserve (because of the potential emotional despair of the patient) and hope (who am I to rob a patient of their hope?). In the second phase of the project, several approaches were developed to help caregivers, patients and informal caregivers with the planning and execution of conversations about end-of-life care. Meetings were organised for patients and informal caregivers to foster awareness and to provide information. For caregivers, information was provided (via symposia and an app) and specifically designed training sessions were developed. The training sessions consist of reflection on the caregivers' personal choices with regard to end-of-life care (research has shown that caregivers choose less intensive medical treatments at the end of life) and of practising with the known complicating factors of timing, reserve and hope, and the different ways of thinking and talking about death and dying (typology of death and dying).

Educational aims: To understand the importance of discussing end-of-life care preferences with your patients at the appropriate time.To become aware of the possible interfering factors of timing, reserve and hope in talking about end-of-life care.

Key points: Using the Surprise Question may be a useful tool in determining the appropriate moment to discuss this with your patients.By talking with your patients about end-of-life care in a timely manner, unnecessary and unwanted treatment can be prevented.Constraints of doctors to implement this in their practice can be overcome by implementing a training session as described in this article.Collaboration between primary and secondary care on this issue is strongly recommended in order to assure the care continuum maximally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Visser J. ‘De arts staat in de behandelmodus’. Ook patienten leggen zich vaak niet neer bij de dood. [The doctor is in treatment-mode. Patients also often do not accept death.] Med Contact 2012; 67: 1326–1329.
    1. Beelen van A. Huisartsen durven confrontatie behandeling niet aan. MedNet-peiling over de grens van een behandeling, [GPs are afraid to discuss treatment options. MedNet-poll on the bounderies of treatments.] MedNet 2014; 07: 10–13.
    1. Lamas D, Rosenbaum L. Freedom from the tyranny of choice – teaching the end-of-life conversation. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1655–1657. - PubMed
    1. van de Laar E, van der Aa G, Naus K, et al. Communicatie over ingrijpende keuzes. Een beschouwing aan de hand van het project ‘Tijdig spreken over het levenseinde’. [Communication in making profound choices. An analysis through the project ‘Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner’.] In: Smeenk F, Rutten H, van de Laar E, eds. Toegewijde dokters. Waarom de niet-medische competenties geen bijzaak zijn. [Dedicated doctors. Why the non-medical competencies are no less important.] Antwerpen/Apeldoorn, Catharina-reeks, 2016; pp. 592–597.
    1. Murray K. Doctors really do die differently. Research says that more physicians plan ahead, reject CPR and die in peace. www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2012/07/23/doctors-really-do-die-differently/... Date last updated: July 23, 2012.

LinkOut - more resources