Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;27(8):1960-1970.
doi: 10.1177/1073191118778896. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Determining a Short Form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) Czech Version: Validity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Parkinson's Disease and Cross-Cultural Comparison

Affiliations

Determining a Short Form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) Czech Version: Validity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Parkinson's Disease and Cross-Cultural Comparison

Ondrej Bezdicek et al. Assessment. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is one of the most common screening instruments for mild cognitive impairment. However, the standard MoCA is approximately two times longer to administer than the Mini-Mental State Examination. A total of 699 Czech and 175 American participants received the standard MoCA Czech and English versions and in the clinical part, a sample of 102 nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We created a validated Czech short version (s-MoCA-CZ) from the original using item response theory. As expected, s-MoCA-CZ scores were highly correlated with the standard version (Pearson r = .94, p < .001). s-MoCA-CZ also had 80% classification accuracy in the differentiation of PD mild cognitive impairment from PD without impairment. The s-MoCA-CZ, a brief screening tool, is shorter to administer than the standard MoCA. It provides high-classification accuracy for PD mild cognitive impairment and is equivalent to that of the standard MoCA-CZ.

Keywords: MMSE; MoCA; cognitive screening; s-MoCA; s-MoCA-CZ; test equating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, & Kragh-Sorensen P (2003). Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: An 8-year prospective study. Archives of Neurology, 60, 387–392. - PubMed
    1. Aarsland D, Creese B, Politis M, Chaudhuri KR, Ffytche DH, Weintraub D, & Ballard C (2017). Cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Nature Review Neurology, 13, 217–231. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.27 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aarsland D, Larsen JP, Karlsen K, Lim NG, & Tandberg, (1999). Mental symptoms in Parkinson’s disease are important contributors to caregiver distress. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 866–874. - PubMed
    1. Benton AL, Hamsher K, & Sivan AB (1994). Multilingual Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
    1. Bezdicek O, Libon DJ, Stepankova H, Panenkova E, Lukavsky J, Garrett KD, … Kopecek M (2014). Development, validity, and normative data study for the 12-word Philadelphia Verbal Learning Test [czP(r)VLT-12] among older and very old Czech adults. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1162–1181. doi:10.1080/13854046.2014.952666 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types