Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 22;9(3):74.
doi: 10.3390/insects9030074.

Determination of Genetic Diversity in Chilo partellus, Busseola fusca, and Spodoptera frugiperda Infesting Sugarcane in Southern Malawi Using DNA Barcodes

Affiliations

Determination of Genetic Diversity in Chilo partellus, Busseola fusca, and Spodoptera frugiperda Infesting Sugarcane in Southern Malawi Using DNA Barcodes

Trust Kasambala Donga et al. Insects. .

Abstract

Sugarcane is one of the most valuable crops in the world. Native and exotic Lepidopteran stemborers significantly limit sugarcane production. However, the identity and genetic diversity of stemborers infesting sugarcane in Malawi is unknown. The main objectives for this study were to identify and determine genetic diversity in stemborers infesting sugarcane in Malawi. We conducted field surveys between June 2016 and March 2017 in the Lower Shire Valley district of Chikwawa and Nsanje, southern Malawi. Molecular identification was based amplification the partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region. Phylogenetic trees for sequences were generated and published GenBank accessions for each species were constructed. We found that Malawi Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) specimens belonged to clade II, Spodoptera frugiperda sp. 1 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) were infesting sugarcane. Interspecific divergence ranged from 8.7% to 15.3%. Intraspecific divergence was highest for B. fusca, 3.6%. There were eight haplotypes for B. fusca, three for S. frugiperda and three for C. partellus. The importance of accurate species identification and genetic diversity on stemborer management is presented.

Keywords: COI gene; Crambidae; Lepidoptera; Noctuidae; Sugarcane; population genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of localities where Busseola fusca, Chilo partellus, and Spodoptera frugiperda were sampled in Chikwawa and Nsanje districts, southern Malawi.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent distribution of Busseola fusca, Chilo partellus, and Spodoptera frugiperda (based on morphological) collected from sugarcane fields in Chikwawa and Nsanje districts, southern Malawi (n = 217).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phylogenetic tree inferred using the Maximum Likelihood (ML)) method of mtDNA CO1 region of Busseola fusca, Chilo partellus, and Spodoptera frugiperda sequences obtained from sugarcane fields in southern Malawi together with reference sequences from other African countries. (A) The tree is based on the Kimura 2-parameter method. (B) The tree is based on Tamura 3-parameter model with evolutionarily invariable (T92 + I). Both trees were resampled with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support values on the branches are given.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phylogenetic tree inferred using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method of 11 mtDNA CO1 region of Busseola fusca sequences obtained from sugarcane fields in southern Malawi together with reference sequences from other African countries. The tree is based on the Kimura 2-parameter method. The tree was resampled with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support values on the branches are given.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Phylogenetic tree inferred using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method of 11 mtDNA CO1 region of Spodoptera frugiperda sequences obtained from sugarcane fields in southern Malawi together with reference sequences from other African countries. The tree is based on the Kimura 2-parameter method and 1000 bootstrap duplications.

Similar articles

References

    1. FAOSTAT Crops: Sugar Cane. [(accessed on 19 August 2017)]; Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
    1. OECD/FAO OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015. Commodity Snapshots. [(accessed on 24 July 2016)];2015 doi: 10.1787/888933229199. Available online: - DOI
    1. ILLOVO Sugar Malawi plc Annual Report. [(accessed on 15 November 2017)];2017 Available online: https://www.illovosugarafrica.com/UserContent/documents/Announcements/20....
    1. Agricane Malawi . Handbook for Sustainable Sugarcane Production in Malawi for the Sugarcane Smallholder Outgrowers’ Capacity Buildings Project. Solidaridad Southern Africa; Blantyre, Malawi: 2011. pp. 3–10.
    1. Moolman J., Van den Berg J., Conlong D., Cugala D., Siebert S., Le Ru B. Species diversity and distribution of lepidopteran stem borers in South Africa and Mozambique. J. Appl. Entomol. 2014;138:52–66. doi: 10.1111/jen.12085. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources