Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device
- PMID: 29933250
- PMCID: PMC6342671
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000823
Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device
Abstract
The relationship between the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) position and pump thrombosis has been reported. However, further clinical implications of device position are unknown. This study aimed to investigate optimal device position for better left ventricular (LV) unloading and patient prognosis. Patients undergoing a ramp test with right heart catheterization after HeartMate II LVAD implantation were enrolled to this study. Device position was quantified from the chest X-ray obtained at the time of the ramp test: (1) inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line, (2) pump angle relative to spine, (3) pump depth, (4) angle between inflow cannula and pump, and (5) angle between pump and outflow graft. LV unloading was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at set LVAD speed. Fifty-four patients (60 years old and 34 male [63%]) were enrolled. Nobody experienced device malfunction during the study period. Increased LV unloading (i.e., lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) was associated with a narrower inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line. Inflow cannula angle <75° was associated with higher 1 year heart failure readmission-free survival rate (p < 0.05, hazards ratio 7.56 [95% confidence interval 2.32-24.7]). In conclusion, HeartMate II LVAD inflow cannula position was associated with LV unloading and patient prognosis. Prospective studies to ensure optimal device positioning and target better clinical outcomes are warranted.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Cannula and Pump Positions Are Associated With Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcome in Patients With HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device.J Card Fail. 2018 Mar;24(3):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Oct 2. J Card Fail. 2018. PMID: 28982636 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal cannula positioning of HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device.Artif Organs. 2020 Dec;44(12):e509-e519. doi: 10.1111/aor.13755. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Artif Organs. 2020. PMID: 32557769
-
Quantitative Assessment of Inflow Malposition in Two Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1377-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 3. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29305851
-
Hemodynamic Pump-Patient Interactions and Left Ventricular Assist Device Imaging.Cardiol Clin. 2018 Nov;36(4):561-569. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2018.06.013. Cardiol Clin. 2018. PMID: 30297073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.J Cardiol. 2018 Apr;71(4):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 26. J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29287808 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How to Optimize Patient Selection and Device Performance of the Newest Generation Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Aug 7;21(9):48. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0748-x. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019. PMID: 31388835 Review.
-
Numerical study of the effect of LVAD inflow cannula positioning on thrombosis risk.Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022 Jun;25(8):852-860. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1984433. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022. PMID: 34592878 Free PMC article.
-
Pump position and thrombosis in ventricular assist devices: Correlation of radiographs and CT data.Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Dec;44(12):956-964. doi: 10.1177/03913988211017552. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Int J Artif Organs. 2021. PMID: 34088235 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.ASAIO J. 2020 Mar;66(3):253-257. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001079. ASAIO J. 2020. PMID: 31567410 Free PMC article.
-
Ventricular assist devices implantation: surgical assessment and technical strategies.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Feb;11(1):277-291. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-325. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021. PMID: 33708499 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al.: Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant 34: 1495–1504, 2015. - PubMed
-
- Stulak JM, Davis ME, Haglund N, et al.: Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151: 177–189, 2016. - PubMed
-
- Maltais S, Kilic A, Nathan S, et al.; PREVENT Study Investigators: PREVENtion of HeartMate II Pump Thrombosis Through Clinical Management: The PREVENT multi-center study. J Heart Lung Transplant 36: 1–12, 2017. - PubMed
-
- Doligalski CT, Jennings DL: Device-related thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support. J Pharm Pract 29: 58–66, 2016. - PubMed
-
- Adamson RM, Bower BL, Sundareswaran KS, Farrar DJ, Dembitsky WP: Radiologic assessment of HeartMate II position: Minimal pump migration after long-term support. J Heart Lung Transplant 34: 1617–1623, 2015. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical