Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 22;13(6):e0198588.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198588. eCollection 2018.

Positive organizational behavior: Longitudinal effects on subjective well-being

Affiliations

Positive organizational behavior: Longitudinal effects on subjective well-being

Kathrin Heinitz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Increasing individual subjective well-being has various positive outcomes, knowledge about its antecedents and the mediators of this relationship can therefore help to increase subjective well-being and the accompanying positive effects. The more future oriented facets of psychological capital, i.e. optimism, hope and self-efficacy have been shown in several studies to be positively related to subjective well-being and negatively to ill-being. Furthermore, recent studies suggest coping strategies as mediators for these relationships. In our study, we examined the longitudinal relation of optimism, hope and self-efficacy with subjective well-being and ill-being in a German panel dataset and tested the mediating effect of flexible goal adjustment in a path model. Our results show a statistically significant positive effect of self-efficacy and optimism on subjective well-being as well as a statistically significant negative effect of optimism on depression over three years. All three predictors show a statistically significant relation with flexible goal adjustment, but flexible goal adjustment did not mediate the effect on subjective well-being or depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that not competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Path model of the longitudinal relation of self-efficacy, optimism and hope with well-being and depression, mediated by flexible goal-adjustment.
Regression weights are standardized beta-weights, a critical health event is coded no/yes; b sex is coded male/female;.* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cropanzano R, Wright TA. When a "happy" worker is really a "productive" worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 2001;53(3):182–199. doi: 10.1037//106W087.53.3.182 - DOI
    1. Lucas RE, Diener E. The happy worker: Hypotheses about the role of positive affect in worker productivity In: Barrick MR, Ryan AM, editors. Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. P.30–59.
    1. Zelenski JM, Murphy SA, Jenkins DA. The happy-productive worker thesis revisited. J HAPPINESS STUD. 2008;9(4):521–537.
    1. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2011;3(1):1–43.
    1. Ilies R, Aw SS, Pluut H. Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY. 2015;24(6):827–838.

LinkOut - more resources