Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- PMID: 29936196
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.030
Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Hamstring tendon autografts and soft-tissue allograft are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the clinical outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus soft-tissue allografts.
Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 8 September 2017 to identify randomized controlled studies that compared hamstring tendon autografts with soft-tissue allografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Two authors independently graded the methodological quality of each eligible study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and extracted relevant data. Statistical heterogeneity among the trials was evaluated with chi-square and I-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential differences according to type of reconstruction technique (single-bundle or double-bundle).
Results: Eight studies with 785 combined patients (396 hamstring tendon autografts and 389 soft-tissue allografts) were included. Two studies had a high risk of bias. The other six studies had unclear risk of bias. There were significant differences between the groups in subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (mean difference [MD], 2.43; 95%CI, 0.69-4.18; p = 0.006), Tegner score (MD, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.03), and side-to-side difference (MD, -1.37; 95%CI, -2.44 to -0.30; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lysholm score, complications, pivot shift test, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, overall IKDC score, or range of motion. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that for primary ACL reconstruction using the single-bundle technique, soft-tissue allografts were inferior to hamstring tendon autografts in subjective IKDC score, anterior drawer test, and side-to-side difference.
Conclusion: Soft-tissue allografts are inferior to hamstring tendon autografts with respect to subjective patient evaluation and knee stability but superior in the complication of hypoesthesia for patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring tendon autograft; Outcomes; Soft-tissue allograft.
Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Irradiated Hamstring Tendon Allograft Versus Autograft for Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Clinical Outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2579-2588. doi: 10.1177/0363546516655333. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27466222 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee. 2015 Mar;22(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Knee. 2015. PMID: 25547048 Review.
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30790526
-
Irradiated allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective studies.Int J Surg. 2018 Jan;49:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29247811
-
Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28205075 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 6;35(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04244-1. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 40188407 Free PMC article.
-
The use of allograft tissue in posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1791-1809. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05426-1. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30824979 Review.
-
Clinical Research Progress of Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation Technique in Knee Ligament Injury Repair and Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1999. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051999. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Sep 14;6(9):808-815. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210023. eCollection 2021 Sep. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34667652 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 4;16(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02624-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34348750 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical