Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Aug:105:91-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

T-Track-CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV assays for prediction of protection from CMV reactivation in kidney transplant recipients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

T-Track-CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV assays for prediction of protection from CMV reactivation in kidney transplant recipients

Smaranda Gliga et al. J Clin Virol. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Assays detecting CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) may support the current management of CMV infection in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, by allowing a better risk assessment and adjusting antiviral treatment.

Objectives: The primary endpoint was the performance of two tests measuring CMV-specific interferon-gamma production, both approved for commercial use in clinical settings. Secondarily, we determined a cut-off for the cellular immune response, which protects against CMV reactivation/infection.

Study design: Thirty kidney transplant (KTx) patients were stratified according to their CMV-IgG status pre-transplantation (Tx) and were divided into two groups: pre-emptive (donor-/recipient+, donor+/recipient+) and prophylaxis (donor+/recipient-). An ELISpot (T-Track-CMV) was performed at month 1 post-Tx (pre-emptive group) and end of prophylaxis and one month thereafter (prophylaxis group). An ELISA (QuantiFERON-CMV) was performed every 2-4 weeks (pre-emptive) or monthly (prophylaxis), in parallel to the CMV viral load (PCR).

Results: A good positive agreement was obtained between the QuantiFERON-CMV or T-Track-CMV and the CMV-IgG (kappa = 0.839 and 0.824, respectively). A cut-off of 19.5 spot forming units (SFU)/200,000 lymphocytes for the T-Track-CMV IE-1 (AUC = 0.802, sensitivity 45%, specificity 100%) and 495 SFU/200,000 lymphocytes for the T-Track-CMV pp65 (AUC = 0.617, sensitivity 11%, specificity 100%) was defined to assess protection against reactivation. The QuantiFERON-CMV performed modestly (AUC = 0.477, cut-off 85.1 IU/ml).

Conclusions: The QuantiFERON-CMV and T-Track-CMV enable the functional assessment of CMV-specific CMI in KTx recipients. In combination with CMV viral load monitoring, T-Track-CMV results could stratify patients at risk of CMV reactivation/infection.

Keywords: CMV; Cell-mediated immunity; ELISpot; Kidney transplant; QuantiFERON.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances