The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients
- PMID: 29936510
- PMCID: PMC6172793
- DOI: 10.1159/000487749
The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients
Abstract
Although the benefit of bimodal listening in cochlear implant users has been agreed on, speech comprehension remains a challenge in acoustically complex real-life environments due to reverberation and disturbing background noises. One way to additionally improve bimodal auditory performance is the use of directional microphones. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a binaural beamformer for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. This prospective study measured speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise in a repeated-measures design that varied in listening modality for static and dynamic listening conditions. A significant improvement in SRT of 4.7 dB was found with the binaural beamformer switched on in the bimodal static listening condition. No significant improvement was found in the dynamic listening condition. We conclude that there is a clear additional advantage of the binaural beamformer in bimodal CI users for predictable/static listening conditions with frontal target speech and spatially separated noise sources.
Keywords: Bimodal hearing; Binaural beamformer; Cochlear implant; Fitting; Hearing aid.
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.Audiol Neurootol. 2024;29(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000536431. Epub 2024 Mar 6. Audiol Neurootol. 2024. PMID: 38447538 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Jun;125(6):596-606. doi: 10.1080/00016480510027493. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 16076708 Clinical Trial.
-
Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160829. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27537075 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ef3d3e. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17823546 Review.
-
Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.Trends Amplif. 2007 Sep;11(3):161-92. doi: 10.1177/1084713807304357. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17709573 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Sep;31(8):578-589. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709449. Epub 2020 Apr 27. J Am Acad Audiol. 2020. PMID: 32340055 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling speech reception thresholds and their improvements due to spatial noise reduction algorithms in bimodal cochlear implant users.Hear Res. 2022 Jul;420:108507. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108507. Epub 2022 Apr 11. Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35484022 Free PMC article.
-
Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211005931. doi: 10.1177/23312165211005931. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 33926327 Free PMC article.
-
Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221112762. doi: 10.1177/23312165221112762. Trends Hear. 2022. PMID: 35862265 Free PMC article.
-
The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.Audiol Neurootol. 2024;29(4):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000536431. Epub 2024 Mar 6. Audiol Neurootol. 2024. PMID: 38447538 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1995;57:289–300.
-
- Blamey PJ, Maat B, Baskent D, Mawman D, Burke E, Dillier N, et al. A retrospective multicenter study comparing speech perception outcomes for bilateral implantation and bimodal rehabilitation. Ear Hear. 2015;36:408–416. - PubMed
-
- Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg GF. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology. 1995;34:260–284. - PubMed
-
- Ching TY, Dillon H, Katsch R, Byrne D. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear. 2001;22:212–224. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous