Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Sep;177(9):1335-1342.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3195-x. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Kishore Baske et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

We compared epinephrine and dopamine as a first-line vasoactive drug in 40 neonates (enrolled in two gestational age strata ≤ 306/7 and ≥ 310/7 weeks) with fluid-refractory septic shock. Epinephrine or dopamine was initiated at 0.2 or 10 μg/kg/min, respectively. If shock persisted after 15 min, epinephrine or dopamine was increased to 0.3 or 15 μg/kg/min, respectively (16-30 min), and thereafter to 0.4 or 20 μg/kg/min (31-45 min). Proportion of neonates achieving 'reversal of shock' (defined as systolic and diastolic BP > fifth centile and capillary filling time < 3 s and left ventricular output ≥ 150 mL/kg/min) by 45 min [5 (25%) vs 6 (30%), RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.30, 2.29)]; haemodynamic stability (shock reversal for ≥ 120 min without escalation of vasoactive drugs) anytime during therapy [10 (50%) vs 6 (30%), RR 1.67 (95% CI 0.75, 3.71)]; and all-cause mortality by 28 days [14 (70%) vs 16 (80%), RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.61, 1.26)] were comparable in the epinephrine and dopamine groups, respectively. On stratified analysis, we observed an interaction of gestational age strata with the group of allocation favouring epinephrine in neonates ≤ 306/7 weeks.Conclusion: Epinephrine (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and dopamine (10-20 μg/kg/min) had comparable efficacy and safety in neonatal septic shock.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: The study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2015/10/006285. What is Known: • The choice of vasoactive drugs in neonatal septic shock is empirical and dopamine is the conventional first-line vasoactive drug. • There are no randomized controlled trials comparing dopamine and epinephrine in neonatal septic shock. What is New: • In this study, epinephrine and dopamine had comparable efficacy and safety as a first-line vasoactive drug in management of neonatal septic shock. • On stratified analysis in a limited sample, epinephrine was associated with better outcomes in neonates ≤ 306/7 weeks.

Keywords: Dopamine; Epinephrine; Neonate; Septic shock; Vasoactive agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 7;48(9):1859-64 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1995 Mar;126(3):333-44 - PubMed
    1. J Dev Physiol. 1982 Dec;4(6):327-38 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2012 Mar 1;10(1):50-98 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Mar;74(2):F88-94 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources