Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 23;40(6):441-445.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.06.008.

[Clinical application value of combined detection of serum miR-378 and miR-21 in gastric cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Clinical application value of combined detection of serum miR-378 and miR-21 in gastric cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
S K Huang et al. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of combined detection of serum miR-378 and miR-21 in gastric cancer (GC). Methods: Eighty-seven patients with GC and 78 patients with colorectal cancer(CRC) from National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were selected, 83 individuals undergoing healthy physical examination were selected as the healthy controls. The levels of serum miR-378 and miR-21 were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) (result data were transformed as log2 for analysis). Results: Relative expression levels of miR-378 in the serum were -1.24, -3.25 and -2.73 in healthy controls, GC and CRC patients, respectively. Compared with the healthy controls, the levels of serum miR-378 were significantly decreased in GC and CRC patients (both P<0.05). Relative expression levels of miR-21 in the serum were 0.11, 2.34 and 2.47 in healthy controls, GC and CRC patients, respectively. Compared with the healthy controls, the levels of serum miR-21 were significantly up-regulated in GC and CRC patients (both P<0.05). Moreover, the serum level of miR-378 in GC patients was inversely associated with tumor clinical stage (P<0.05). However, the level of miR-21 showed no significant differences among patients with different clinical and pathological characteristics (all P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of miRNA-378 to diagnose GC was 0.770, 82.0% and 66.0%, respectively, and were 0.900, 85.0%, and 88.0% of miR-21, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of combined detection of serum miR-378 and miR-21 to diagnose GC were 0.930, 92.0% and 87.0%, respectively, while the AUC of combined detection of serum CEA and CA-199 was 0.767, the AUC of combined all of the four factors was 0.946. Conclusion: The combined detection of serum miR-378 and miR-21 have a certain effect on diagnosis of GC.

目的: 探讨血清miR-378和miR-21联合检测对胃癌的临床诊断价值。 方法: 选择中国医学科学院肿瘤医院经病理确诊的胃癌患者87例,结直肠癌患者78例,健康体检者83例,采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测血清样本中miR-378和miR-21的表达水平(以log(2)对结果进行转换)。 结果: miR-378在健康对照者、胃癌患者和结直肠癌患者血清中的相对表达水平分别为-1.24、-3.25和-2.73,miR-378在胃癌和结直肠癌患者血清中的相对表达水平明显低于健康对照者(均P<0.05)。miR-21在健康对照者、胃癌患者和结直肠癌患者血清中的相对表达水平分别为0.11、2.34和2.47,miR-21在胃癌和结直肠癌患者血清中的相对表达水平明显高于健康对照者(均P<0.05)。胃癌患者血清中miR-378的低表达与肿瘤的临床分期有关(P<0.05),分期越晚,下降程度越大;而miR-21在胃癌患者血清中的升高程度与患者的临床病理特征无关(均P>0.05)。血清miR-378诊断胃癌的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.770,灵敏度为82.0%,特异度为66.0%;miR-21诊断胃癌的AUC为0.900,灵敏度为85.0%,特异度为88.0%;miR-378+miR-21诊断胃癌的AUC为0.930,灵敏度为92.0%,特异度为87.0%。CEA+CA-199诊断胃癌的AUC为0.767,CEA+CA-199+miR-378+miR-21诊断胃癌的AUC为0.946。 结论: 联合检测血清中miR-378和miR-21的表达对胃癌具有一定的诊断效能。.

Keywords: Diagnose; Gastric neoplasms; Serum; miR-21; miR-378.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles