Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 8:9:942.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00942. eCollection 2018.

The Effect of Target Sex, Sexual Dimorphism, and Facial Attractiveness on Perceptions of Target Attractiveness and Trustworthiness

Affiliations

The Effect of Target Sex, Sexual Dimorphism, and Facial Attractiveness on Perceptions of Target Attractiveness and Trustworthiness

Yuanyan Hu et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Facial sexual dimorphism has widely demonstrated as having an influence on the facial attractiveness and social interactions. However, earlier studies show inconsistent results on the effect of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness judgments. Previous studies suggest that the level of attractiveness might work as a moderating variable among the relationship between sexual dimorphism and facial preference and have often focused on the effect of sexual dimorphism on general attractiveness ratings, rather than concentrating on trustworthiness perception. Male and female participants viewed target male and female faces that varied on attractiveness (more attractive or less attractive) and sexual dimorphism (masculine or feminine). Participants rated the attractiveness of the faces and reported how much money they would give to the target person as a measure of trust. For the facial attractiveness ratings, (a) both men and women participants preferred masculine male faces to feminine male ones under the more attractive condition, whereas preferred feminine male faces to masculine male ones under the less attractive condition; (b) all participants preferred feminine female faces to masculine female ones under the less attractive condition, while there were no differences between feminine female faces and masculine female faces under the more attractive condition. For the target trustworthiness perception, (a) participants showed no preference between masculine male faces and feminine male faces, neither under the more attractive condition nor the less attractiveness condition; (b) however, all the participants preferred masculine female faces over feminine female faces under the more attractive condition, exhibiting no preference between feminine female faces and masculine female faces under the less attractive condition. These findings suggest that the attractiveness of facial stimulus may be a reason to interpret the inconsistent results from the previous studies, which focused on the effect of facial sexual dimorphism on the facial attractiveness. Furthermore, implications about the effect of target facial sexual dimorphism on participants' trustworthiness perception were discussed.

Keywords: facial attractiveness; feminine; masculine; sexual dimorphism; trustworthiness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Examples of more (first row) and less (second row) attractive face images. Masculine male faces were presented on the left and feminine male faces on the right (left group). Feminine female faces were presented on the left and masculine female faces on the right (right group).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Interaction among images’ sexual dimorphism, gender, and facial attractive level for the attractiveness rating task. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Interaction among images’ sexual dimorphism, gender, and facial attractive level for the cooperative behavior task. ∗∗p < 0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borras-Guevara M. L., Batres C., Perrett D. I. (2017). Aggressor or protector? Experiences and perceptions of violence predict preferences for masculinity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38 481–489. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.004 - DOI
    1. Buckingham G., DeBruine L. M., Little A. C., Welling L. L. M., Conway C. A., Tiddeman B. P., et al. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27 381–389. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.03.001 - DOI
    1. Carré J. M., McCormick C. M. (2008). In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proc. R. Soc. Lon. B Biol. Sci. 275 2651–2656. 10.1098/rspb.2008.0873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carré J. M., McCormick C. M., Mondloch C. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychol. Sci. 20 1194–1198. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cash T. F., Kilcullen R. N. (1985). The aye of the beholder-susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15 591–605. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00903.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources