Skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation
- PMID: 29937801
- PMCID: PMC6002575
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2016.01.001
Skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation
Abstract
Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our understanding and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions.
Methods: We reported a case of severe skin reactions caused by BAHA implantation. Related literature were also reviewed.
Results: We found grade IV skin reactions, including hyperplasia around the implant, which led to the removal of the BAHA implant 10 months after implantation. The findings indicated poor skin hygiene, allergy to titanium and inadequate surgicals skills as the possible causes of the skin reaction.
Conclusion: Skin adverse reactions, usually rare in BAHA implantation patients, may cause implant removal and implantation failure. We suggest to further investigate the mechanisms underlying titanium allergy.
Keywords: Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA); Conductive hearing disorder; Skin reactions.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.033. Epub 2015 Jan 3. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25680294
-
Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2002;2(3):1-47. Epub 2002 Sep 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2002. PMID: 23074440 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.Otol Neurotol. 2001 May;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200105000-00010. Otol Neurotol. 2001. PMID: 11347635 Clinical Trial.
-
An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:22-31. doi: 10.1159/000323577. Epub 2011 Mar 8. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011. PMID: 21389701 Review.
-
Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 30;11:640899. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.640899. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33859952 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3171-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06511-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33389004
-
Integrated microtia and aural atresia management.Front Surg. 2022 Dec 26;9:944223. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944223. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36636584 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Arnold A., Caversaccio M.D. Surgery for the bone-anchored hearing aid. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:47–55. - PubMed
-
- Badran K., Arya A.K., Bunstone D. Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2009;123(2):170–176. - PubMed
-
- de Wolf M.J., Hol M.K., Mylanus E.A. Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2009;118:525–531. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources