Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 25;60(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0393-5.

Prevalence of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms

Affiliations

Prevalence of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms

Therese Råsbäck et al. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Background: Pigs are the most important reservoir for human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. We investigated the herd prevalence of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms by analysing pen faecal samples using a cold enrichment of 1 week and thereafter subsequent plating onto chromogenic selective media (CAY agar).

Results: Pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in 32 (30.5%) of the 105 sampled farms with finisher pigs. Bioserotype 4/O:3 was identified at all but one farm, where 2/O:9 was identified. Pen-prevalence within the positive herds varied from 1/4 to 4/4 pens. The calculated intra-class correlation coefficient ICC (0.89) from a model with a random effect for grouping within herd indicated a very high degree of clustering by herd. None of the explored risk factors, including herd size, herd type, pig flow, feed type, access to outdoors, evidence of birds and rodents in the herd, usage of straw, number of pigs in sampled pen and age of pigs in pen were significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica status of the pen. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica in the pen (OR = 84.77, 4.05-1772). Two culture methods were assessed for detection of Y. enterocolitica, one of which included the use of a chromogenic agar (CAY agar) intended for detection of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. The chromogenic media was found equal or superior to traditional methods and was used in this study. The isolates obtained were characterised by biotyping, serotyping, mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and PCR. Characterisation by MALDI-TOF gave identical results to that of conventional bioserotyping. All porcine isolates were positive for the ail and inv genes by PCR, indicating that the isolates were most likely pathogenic to humans.

Conclusions: Human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in nearly one-third of the Swedish pig farms with finisher pigs. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was associated with the presence of Y. enterocolitica in the pen. A modified culturing method using a chromogenic agar was efficient for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pig faeces. The use of masspectrometry for identification and subtyping was in agreement with conventional biotyping and serotyping methods.

Keywords: Biotyping; Farm; Mass spectrometry; Pig; Prevalence; Risk factors; Serotyping; Yersinia enterocolitica; Zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 2/O:9 isolate, displaying pink colour with a mauve coloured “bull´s eye”, on CHROMagar™ Y. enterocolitica (CAY) plate incubated at 25 °C for 24–48 h. b Swarming colonies of a Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 1B/O:8 isolate on CHROMagar™ Y. enterocolitica (CAY) plate incubated at 25 °C for 24–48 h
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 4/O:3 isolate on CHROMagar™ Y. enterocolitica (CAY) plate incubated at 25 °C for 24–48 h. White colony formations with a transparent “bull’s eye”. b Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 1A/O:8 isolate on CHROMagar™ Y. enterocolitica (CAY) plate incubated at 25 °C for 24–48 h. Blue swarming colonies with dark metallic blue “bull’s eye”
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of pig herds sampled per month. Black cells in the diagram represent pen samples where Y. enterocolitica was isolated; grey cells represent negative samples

References

    1. EFSA, ECDC The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J. 2016;14:4634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bancerz-Kisiel A, Szweda W. Yersiniosis—a zoonotic foodborne disease of relevance to public health. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22:397–402. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1167700. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bottone EJ. Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:257–276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen JK, Sorensen R, Glensbjerg M. Aspects of the epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica: a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 1991;13:231–237. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90007-C. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bottone EJ. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes Infect. 1999;1:323–333. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(99)80028-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources