Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial

Metabolic Contrasts Between Youth and Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: I. Observations Using the Hyperglycemic Clamp

RISE Consortium. Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To compare insulin sensitivity (M/I) and β-cell responses in youth versus adults with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or drug-naïve, recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods: In 66 youth (80.3% with IGT) and 355 adults (70.7% IGT), hyperglycemic clamps were used to measure 1) M/I, 2) acute (0-10 min [first phase]) C-peptide (ACPRg) and insulin (AIRg) responses to glucose, 3) steady-state C-peptide and insulin concentrations at plasma glucose of 11.1 mmol/L, and 4) arginine-stimulated maximum C-peptide (ACPRmax) and insulin (AIRmax) responses at plasma glucose >25 mmol/L. The fasting C-peptide-to-insulin ratio was used as an estimate of insulin clearance.

Results: Insulin sensitivity was 46% lower in youth compared with adults (P < 0.001), and youth had greater acute and steady-state C-peptide (2.3- and 1.3-fold, respectively; each P < 0.001) and insulin responses to glucose (AIRg 3.0-fold and steady state 2.2-fold; each P < 0.001). Arginine-stimulated C-peptide and insulin responses were also greater in youth (1.6- and 1.7-fold, respectively; each P < 0.001). After adjustment for insulin sensitivity, all β-cell responses remained significantly greater in youth. Insulin clearance was reduced in youth (P < 0.001). Participants with diabetes had greater insulin sensitivity (P = 0.026), with lesser C-peptide and insulin responses than those with IGT (all P < 0.001) but similar insulin clearance (P = 0.109).

Conclusions: In people with IGT or recently diagnosed diabetes, youth have lower insulin sensitivity, hyperresponsive β-cells, and reduced insulin clearance compared with adults. Whether these age-related differences contribute to declining β-cell function and/or impact responses to glucose-lowering interventions remains to be determined.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779362 NCT01779375 NCT01763346.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plasma glucose, C-peptide, and insulin concentrations during the hyperglycemic clamps in youth and adults in the three RISE protocols. AC: Pediatric Medication Study (n = 66 [in red]), Adult Medication Study (n = 267 [in blue]) and Adult Surgery Study (n = 88 [in green]). DF: Youth with IGT (n = 53 [in green]) and diabetes (n = 13 [in purple]). GI: Adults with IGT (n = 251 [in green]) and diabetes (n = 104 [in purple]). Data are mean ± SEM. At all time points after commencement of the glucose infusion for the clamp, C-peptide and insulin concentrations were greater in youth than adults (all P < 0.001) as well as in IGT vs. diabetes (all P < 0.001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship of log-transformed M/I and log-transformed ACPRg (A), steady-state (second phase) C-peptide concentration (B), ACPRmax (C), AIRg (D), and AIRmax (E) in youth (n = 66 [in red]) and adults (n = 355 [in blue]). The axes are logged with the values on each being natural numbers. Lines were fit by linear regression on the log-log scale. The slopes relating the five β-cell response measures to M/I were all significant (P < 0.001), and the group differences were also all significant (all P < 0.001 except steady-state C-peptide [P = 0.047]). The slopes for youth and adults did not differ (all P ≥ 0.200).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship of log-transformed M/I and log-transformed ACPRg (A), steady-state (second phase) C-peptide concentration (B), ACPRmax (C), AIRg (D), and AIRmax (E) in participants with IGT (n = 304 [in green]) and diabetes (n = 117 [in purple]). The axes are logged with the values on each being natural numbers. Lines were fit by linear regression on the log-log scale. The slopes relating the five β-cell response measures to M/I were all significant (P < 0.001). Slopes for M/I and ACPRg in individuals with IGT or diabetes were significantly different (P = 0.031). For all other β-cell response measures, the slopes with M/I were not significantly different between participants with IGT or diabetes (all P > 0.200), and participants with IGT had higher β-cell responses across the range of M/I (all P < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship of fasting glucose and ACPRg (A) and AIRg (B), ACPRmax (C), and AIRmax (D) and fasting glucose and the ratio of fasting C-peptide to insulin in youth (n = 66 [in red]) and adults (n = 355 [in blue]) (E), and IGT (n = 304 [in green]) and diabetes (n = 117 [in purple]) (F). Lines were fit by linear regression of the log-transformed variables and then transformed back to the original scale for plotting. Prior to taking logs, a constant of 1.06 was added to ACPRg and 10.0 to AIRg because of negative values in these variables. Therefore, all plotted values appear greater than 0. The slopes relating the β-cell response measures to fasting glucose were all significant (all P < 0.001), and the group differences were also all significant (all P < 0.001). The slopes for youth and adults did not differ (all P ≥ 0.21). For the relation of the fasting C-peptide–to–insulin ratio to fasting glucose, there were no significant relationships. Youth had a ratio that was lower than adults across the fasting glucose range (P < 0.001), while there was no difference across the same glucose range between IGT and diabetes.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. . IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;128:40–50 - PubMed
    1. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, et al. .; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study . Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1419–1429 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017 [article online], 2017. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-stat.... Accessed 18 July 2017
    1. World Health Organzation. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. Overweight and obesity [Internet], 2017. Available from http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/overweight/en/. Accessed 24 August 2017
    1. Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA 2018;319:1723–1725 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data