Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of Insulin and Metformin Versus Metformin Alone on β-Cell Function in Youth With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

RISE Consortium. Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric type 2 diabetes prevalence is increasing, with β-cell dysfunction key in its pathogenesis. The RISE Pediatric Medication Study compared two approaches-glargine followed by metformin and metformin alone-in preserving or improving β-cell function in youth with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes during and after therapy withdrawal.

Research design and methods: Ninety-one pubertal, overweight/obese 10-19-year-old youth with IGT (60%) or type 2 diabetes of <6 months duration (40%) were randomized to either 3 months of insulin glargine with a target glucose of 4.4-5.0 mmol/L followed by 9 months of metformin or to 12 months of metformin alone. β-Cell function (insulin sensitivity paired with β-cell responses) was assessed by hyperglycemic clamp at baseline, 12 months (on treatment), and 15 months (3 months off treatment).

Results: No significant differences were observed between treatment groups at baseline, 12 months, or 15 months in β-cell function, BMI percentile, HbA1c, fasting glucose, or oral glucose tolerance test 2-h glucose results. In both treatment groups, clamp-measured β-cell function was significantly lower at 12 and 15 months versus baseline. HbA1c fell transiently at 6 months within both groups. BMI was higher in the glargine followed by metformin versus metformin alone group between 3 and 9 months. Only 5% of participants discontinued the interventions, and both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: In youth with IGT or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes, neither 3 months of glargine followed by 9 months of metformin nor 12 months of metformin alone halted the progressive deterioration of β-cell function. Alternate approaches to preserve β-cell function in youth are needed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779375.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Insulin doses and corresponding fasting glucose values over time while on glargine treatment. A: Mean fasting morning SMBG values every 2 weeks over 12 weeks. B: Mean glargine dose corresponding to each SMBG value. C: Corresponding percentage of participants who achieved the goal fasting SMBG of 4.4–5.0 mmol/L every 2 weeks. Data are mean (95% CI).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glucose and C-peptide values during the hyperglycemic clamp at baseline, after 12 months of treatment, and 3 months after discontinuing the intervention (15 months). The glargine followed by metformin group (n = 44 [green]) and the metformin alone group (n = 47 [brown]) are shown. The steady-state glucose targets were 11.1 mmol/L between 90 and 120 min and >25 mmol/L at 150 min. Data are mean ± SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship of the two coprimary outcomes: hyperglycemic clamp-derived β-cell responses (steady-state C-peptide and ACPRmax) paired with M/I. Changes are shown from baseline to 12 and 15 months for the clamp-derived β-cell responses of steady-state C-peptide (A) and ACPRmax (B) paired with M/I. The black line depicts the joint relationship between β-cell response and M/I at baseline for the full cohort, with the mean value at baseline for the full cohort indicated by the black box with a 0. The dotted lines to boxes at months 12 and 15 show the trajectory of values from baseline to 12 months of intervention and then to 3 months after discontinuation of the intervention (15 months) for glargine followed by metformin (green) and metformin alone (brown). Values above the black line represent improved β-cell function, and values below the line represent poorer β-cell function. The ellipses depict the 95% confidence bands around the points at months 12 and 15. No significant differences were observed at any time point between treatment arms; however, significant within-group declines were seen from baseline while on active treatment through 12 months for steady-state C-peptide with M/I (glargine followed by metformin P = 0.019, metformin alone P = 0.025) and ACPRmax with M/I (glargine followed by metformin P < 0.001, metformin alone P = 0.001) and through 15 months for steady-state C-peptide with M/I (glargine followed by metformin P < 0.001, metformin alone P = 0.031) and ACPRmax with M/I (glargine followed by metformin P = 0.001, metformin alone P < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
BMI and glycemia over time. BMI (A), HbA1c (B), fasting glucose (C), and OGTT 2-h glucose over 15 months (D). In the glargine followed by metformin group (n = 44 [green]), glargine insulin was given from baseline to 3 months followed by metformin from months 3 through 12. In the metformin alone group (n = 47 [brown]), metformin was given from baseline through 12 months. Treatment was discontinued in both groups at 12 months. Data are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 for the difference between treatment groups at the specified time point; §P < 0.05 for the difference within treatment group between the specified time point and baseline.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, et al. ; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1419–1429 - PMC - PubMed
    1. TODAY Study Group A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2247–2256 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, et al. .; ADOPT Study Group . Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2427–2443 - PubMed
    1. TODAY Study Group Effects of metformin, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in TODAY. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1749–1757 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Role of insulin secretion and sensitivity in the evolution of type 2 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program: Effects of lifestyle intervention and metformin. Diabetes 2005;54:2404–2414 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data