Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul 17:1:2055207615595335.
doi: 10.1177/2055207615595335. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

Theory-based strategies for enhancing the impact and usage of digital health behaviour change interventions: A review

Affiliations
Review

Theory-based strategies for enhancing the impact and usage of digital health behaviour change interventions: A review

Leanne G Morrison. Digit Health. .

Abstract

There is growing evidence that digital interventions can successfully effect meaningful changes in health-related behaviour. However, optimisation of digital intervention delivery is challenged by low usage, high attrition and small effect sizes. Whilst a number of conceptual frameworks and models exist to guide intervention planning and development, insufficient attention has been paid to how existing psychological theory could inform the optimal implementation and delivery of the design features commonly used in digital health behaviour change interventions. This paper provides a critical review of psychological theories and models in order to consider their implications for the design of digital interventions. The theories reviewed include theories of: persuasion and attitude change; motivation; volition and self-regulation; patient preferences for participation in medical decision making; and social support. A set of theory-based guidelines is provided to inform the development of future interventions.

Keywords: Health behaviour; Internet intervention; eHealth; engagement; health promotion; psychological theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Lustria MLA, Noar SM, Cortese J, et al. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun 2013; 18: 1039–1069. - PubMed
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: A systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RAC, et al. Intervention mapping: Protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol 2004; 9: 85–98. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources