Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 7:4:2055207618771757.
doi: 10.1177/2055207618771757. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery

Affiliations

Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery

Danielle Arigo et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

As the popularity and diversity of social media platforms increases so does their utility for health research. Using social media for recruitment into clinical studies and/or delivering health behavior interventions may increase reach to a broader audience. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of these approaches is limited, and key questions remain with respect to optimal benchmarks, intervention development and methodology, participant engagement, informed consent, privacy, and data management. Little methodological guidance is available to researchers interested in using social media for health research. In this Tutorial, we summarize the content of the 2017 Society for Behavioral Medicine Pre-Conference Course entitled 'Using Social Media for Research,' at which the authors presented their experiences with methodological and ethical issues relating to social media-enabled research recruitment and intervention delivery. We identify common pitfalls and provide recommendations for recruitment and intervention via social media. We also discuss the ethical and responsible conduct of research using social media for each of these purposes.

Keywords: Digital health; Facebook; Twitter; health behavior change; research ethics; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of well-crafted versus suboptimal tweet.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The CORE interface.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greenwood S, Perrin A and Duggan M. Social media update 2016: Facebook usage and engagement is on the rise, while adoption of other platforms holds steady. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ (2016, accessed 19 June 2017).
    1. Brown J, Kotz D, Michie S, et al. How effective and cost-effective was the national mass media smoking cessation campaign ‘Stoptober’? Drug Alcohol Depend 2014; 135: 52–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris JK, Hawkins JB, Nguyen L, et al. Using Twitter to identify and respond to food poisoning: The Food Safety STL Project. J Public Health Manag Pract. Epub ahead of print 3 February 2017. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul MJ, Dredze M, Broniatowski D. Forcast the flu: Twitter improves influenza forecasting. PLoS Curr 2014; 6: pii. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG. Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16: 247–251. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources