Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review
- PMID: 29943057
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6300-3
Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) is the gold standard technique for cholecystectomy. In order to reduce postoperative pain and improve cosmetic results, the application of the single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) technique was introduced, leading surgeons to face important challenges. Robotic technology has been proposed to overcome some of these limitations. The purpose of this review is to assess the safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC) for benign disease.
Methods: An Embase and Pubmed literature search was performed in February 2017. Randomized controlled trial and prospective observational studies were selected and assessed using PRISMA recommendations. Primary outcome was overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative bile leak rate, total conversion rate, operative time, wound complication rate, postoperative hospital stay, and port site hernia rate. The outcomes were analyzed in Forest plots based on fixed and random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results: A total of 13 studies provided data about 1010 patients who underwent to SIRC for benign disease of gallbladder. Overall postoperative complications rate was 11.6% but only 4/1010 (0.4%) patients required further surgery. A postoperative bile leak was reported in 3/950 patients (0.3%). Conversion occurred in 4.2% of patients. Mean operative time was 86.7 min including an average of 42 min should be added as for robotic console time. Wound complications occurred in 3.7% of patients. Median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day. Port site hernia at the latest follow-up available was reported in 5.2% of patients.
Conclusions: The use of the Da Vinci robot in single-port cholecystectomy seems to have similar results in terms of incidence and grade of complications compared to standard laparoscopy. In addition, it seems affected by the same limitations of single-port surgery, consisting of an increased operative time and incidence of port site hernia.
Keywords: Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Robotic cholecystectomy; Single site; Systematic review.
Similar articles
-
Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3089-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4601-3. Epub 2015 Oct 23. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26497946 Clinical Trial.
-
Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3242-3250. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27864724 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Safe but Faces Technical Challenges.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):857-861. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0183. Epub 2016 Jun 3. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016. PMID: 27258800
-
Robotic-assisted versus conventional/single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 23;104(21):e42493. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042493. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40419930 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4377-4392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6295-9. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29956028
Cited by
-
A Comparative Study of Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Single Incision versus Three-Port versus Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Dec 15;22(4):171-176. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.171. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 35601375 Free PMC article.
-
[Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jun;93(6):566-576. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01608-9. Epub 2022 Feb 28. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022. PMID: 35226123 Review. German.
-
A Comparative Study of Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Single Incision versus Three Port versus Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Dec 15;22(4):137-138. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.137. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 35601373 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform.JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2):e2021.00091. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00091. JSLS. 2022. PMID: 35815324 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic.J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Sep 15;22(3):101-105. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.3.101. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 35599698 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical