Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;29(1):337-344.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5586-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography

Affiliations

Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography

Angela M P Coolen et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse which mammographic and tumour characteristics led to concordant versus discordant recalls at blinded double reading to further optimise our breast cancer screening programme.

Methods: We included a consecutive series of 99,013 screening mammograms obtained between July 2013 and January 2015. All mammograms were double read in a blinded fashion. Discordant readings were routinely recalled without consensus or arbitration. During the 2-year follow-up, relevant data of the recalled women were collected. We compared mammographic characteristics, screening outcome and tumour characteristics between concordant and discordant recalls.

Results: There were 2,543 concordant recalls (71.4%) and 997 discordant recalls (28.0%). The positive predictive value of a concordant recall was significantly higher (23.5% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001). The proportion of BI-RADS 0 was significantly higher in the discordant recall group (75.7% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.001). Discordant recalls were more often an asymmetry or architectural distortion (21.8% vs. 13.2% and 9.3% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the distribution of DCIS and invasive cancers and tumour characteristics were comparable for the two groups, except for a more favourable tumour grade in the discordant recall group (54.7% vs. 39.9% grade I tumours, p = 0.022).

Conclusions: Screen-detected cancers detected by a discordant reading show a more favourable tumour grade than cancers diagnosed after a concordant recall. The higher proportion of asymmetries and architectural distortions in this group provide a possible target for improving screening programmes by additional training of screening radiologists and the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Key points: • With blinded double reading of screening mammograms, screen-detected cancers detected by a discordant reading show a more favourable tumour grade than cancers diagnosed after a concordant recall. • The proportions of asymmetries and architectural distortions are higher in case of a discordant reading. • Possible improvement strategies could target additional training of screening radiologists and the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening programmes.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Follow-up studies; Mammography; Mass screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 2004 Apr 15;100(8):1590-4 - PubMed
    1. Breast. 2006 Feb;15(1):44-51 - PubMed
    1. J Med Screen. 2005;12(3):125-7 - PubMed
    1. Histopathology. 1991 Nov;19(5):403-10 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jun;44(9):1223-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources