Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec;36(12):1997-2008.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2384-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Herney Andrés García-Perdomo et al. World J Urol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness and harms of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy (TMT) as a first-line treatment versus radical cystectomy (RC) plus radical pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in terms of overall survival.

Methods: We included parallel clinical trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that included patients older than 18 years old, diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent TMT compared with RC. The planned comparison was TMT versus RC plus pelvic lymphadenectomy as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were salvage cystectomy and cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival. A search strategy was designed for MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and LILACS. We saturated information with conference abstracts, in progress clinical trials, literature published in non-indexed journals, and other sources of gray literature. Standardized tools assessed the risk of bias independently. We performed the statistical analysis in R v3.4.1 and effect sizes were reported in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Accordingly, we used a random effect model due to the statistical heterogeneity found in included studies.

Results: We found 2682 records with the search strategies and, finally, 11 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The summary HR for OS was 1.06 95%CI (0.85-1.31) I2 = 77%, showing no statistical difference. Regarding cancer-specific survival, the summary HR was 1.23 95%CI (1.04-1.46) I2 = 14%. On the other side, for the progression-free survival, the summary HR was 1.11 95%CI (0.63-1.95) I2 = 78%. Only one study described HR for adverse events (1.37 95%CI 1.16-1.59).

Conclusion: We found no differences in overall survival and progression-free survival between these two interventions. Nonetheless, we found that cancer-specific survival favored patients who received radical cystectomy.

Keywords: Bladder preserving; Cancer; Muscle invasive; Radical cystectomy; Trimodal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):483-487 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(9 Pt B):1345-53 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3801-9 - PubMed
    1. Trials. 2007 Jun 07;8:16 - PubMed
    1. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources