Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;23(1):1489691.
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1489691.

Beyond 'charting outcomes' in the radiation oncology match: analysis of self-reported applicant data

Affiliations

Beyond 'charting outcomes' in the radiation oncology match: analysis of self-reported applicant data

Samuel Jang et al. Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

The Charting Outcomes resource is useful in gauging an applicant's competiveness for a given specialty. However, many variables are not reported in Charting Outcomes that may influence an applicant's ability to match. A significant proportion of applicants record their experiences in an anonymous, self-reported applicant spreadsheet. We analyzed factors associated with a successful match using this dataset to test the hypothesis that research productivity and high academic performance correlates with success rates. A retrospective analysis of "RadOnc Interview Spreadsheet" for the 2015, 2016, and 2017 radiation oncology match was performed. Data were accessed via studentdoctor.net. Board scores, research characteristics, Sub-I participation, and interview invitation rates were available. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. When possible, results were compared to those reported in the National Residency Match Program's "Charting Outcomes" report. A total of 158 applicants were examined for the applicant characteristics. Applicants applied to a median of 61 programs and received a median of 14 interviews. The mean step 1 score was 248 (range: 198 to 272) and most were in the highest grade point average quartile (68.3%). 21.7% participated in additional research year(s), and 19% obtained a PhD. The majority of applicants took three radiation oncology electives (48.7%). On multivariate analysis, alpha-omega-alpha (AOA) honors society status (p=0.033), participating in a research year (p=0.001) and number of journal publications (p=0.047) significantly correlated with higher interview invitation rates. In summary, this study identifies important considerations for radiation oncology applicants that have not been previously reported, such as induction into AOA and number of journal publications.

Keywords: Radiation oncology; applicant; match; online database; student doctor network.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NRMP Results and data: 2017 main residency match. 2017. Accessed 2017 July Available from: http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Main-Match-Results-and-Da....
    1. Ahmed AA, Holliday EB, Deville C, et al. Attracting future radiation oncologists: an analysis of the national resident matching program data trends from 2004 to 2015. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:965–4. - PubMed
    1. NRMP Charting outcomes in the match: characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2014 main residency match. 2014. Accessed 2017 July Available from: http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Charting-Outcomes-2014-Fi....
    1. NRMP Charting outcomes in the match for U.S. allopathic seniors: characteristics of U.S. allopathic seniors who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2016 main residency match. 2016. Accessed 2017 July Available from: https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Charting-Outcomes-US-All....
    1. NRMP Results and data: 2015 main residency match. 2015. Accessed 2017 July Available from: http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Main-Match-Results-and-Da....

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources