Microalgae population dynamics growth with AnMBR effluent: effect of light and phosphorus concentration
- PMID: 29944122
- DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.207
Microalgae population dynamics growth with AnMBR effluent: effect of light and phosphorus concentration
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of light intensity and phosphorus concentration on biomass growth and nutrient removal in a microalgae culture and their effect on their competition. The photobioreactor was continuously fed with the effluent from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor pilot plant treating real wastewater. Four experimental periods were carried out at different light intensities (36 and 52 μmol s-1 m-2) and phosphorus concentrations (around 6 and 15 mgP L-1). Four green algae - Scenedesmus, Chlorella, Monoraphidium and Chlamydomonas- and cyanobacterium were detected and quantified along whole experimental period. Chlorella was the dominant species when light intensity was at the lower level tested, and was competitively displaced by a mixed culture of Scenedesmus and Monoraphidium when light was increased. When phosphorus concentration in the photobioreactor was raised up to 15 mgP L-1, a growth of cyanobacterium became the dominant species in the culture. The highest nutrient removal efficiency (around 58.4 ± 15.8% and 96.1 ± 16.5% of nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively) was achieved at 52 μmol s-1 m-2 of light intensity and 6.02 mgP L-1 of phosphorus concentration, reaching about 674 ± 86 mg L-1 of volatile suspended solids. The results obtained reveal how the light intensity supplied and the phosphorus concentration available are relevant operational factors that determine the microalgae species that is able to predominate in a culture. Moreover, changes in microalgae predominance can be induced by changes in the growth medium produced by the own predominant species.
Similar articles
-
Wastewater nutrient removal in a mixed microalgae-bacteria culture: effect of light and temperature on the microalgae-bacteria competition.Environ Technol. 2018 Feb;39(4):503-515. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1305001. Epub 2017 Mar 27. Environ Technol. 2018. PMID: 28274182
-
Closing Domestic Nutrient Cycles Using Microalgae.Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12450-6. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02858. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Environ Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 26389714
-
Cultivation of four microalgae species in the effluent of anaerobic digester for biodiesel production.Bioresour Technol. 2017 Jan;224:738-742. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.048. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Bioresour Technol. 2017. PMID: 27887778
-
Current practices and challenges in using microalgae for treatment of nutrient rich wastewater from agro-based industries.Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 15;687:1107-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.115. Epub 2019 Jun 12. Sci Total Environ. 2019. PMID: 31412448 Review.
-
Potential for green microalgae to produce hydrogen, pharmaceuticals and other high value products in a combined process.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;33(2):172-215. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2012.681625. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013. PMID: 22765907 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the population dynamics of microalgae isolated from the state of Chiapas, Mexico with respect to the nutritional quality of water.Biodivers Data J. 2018 Sep 26;(6):e28496. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e28496. eCollection 2018. Biodivers Data J. 2018. PMID: 30294208 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of tropical climate on outdoor treatment of anaerobically digested sanitary wastewater using native microalgae.Heliyon. 2025 Jan 10;11(2):e41848. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41848. eCollection 2025 Jan 30. Heliyon. 2025. PMID: 39897888 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous