Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0198483.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198483. eCollection 2018.

"Could you sit down please?" A qualitative analysis of employees' experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings

Affiliations

"Could you sit down please?" A qualitative analysis of employees' experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings

Louise Mansfield et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Office workers spend most of their working day sitting, and prolonged sitting has been associated with increased risk of poor health. Standing in meetings has been proposed as a strategy by which to reduce workplace sitting but little is known about the standing experience. This study documented workers' experiences of standing in normally seated meetings. Twenty-five participants (18+ years), recruited from three UK universities, volunteered to stand in 3 separate, seated meetings that they were already scheduled to attend. They were instructed to stand when and for however long they deemed appropriate, and gave semi-structured interviews after each meeting. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis. Four themes, central to the experience of standing in meetings, were extracted: physical challenges to standing; implications of standing for meeting engagement; standing as norm violation; and standing as appropriation of power. Participants typically experienced some physical discomfort from prolonged standing, apparently due to choosing to stand for as long as possible, and noted practical difficulties of fully engaging in meetings while standing. Many participants experienced marked psychological discomfort due to concern at being seen to be violating a strong perceived sitting norm. While standing when leading the meeting was felt to confer a sense of power and control, when not leading the meeting participants felt uncomfortable at being misperceived to be challenging the authority of other attendees. These findings reveal important barriers to standing in normally-seated meetings, and suggest strategies for acclimatising to standing during meetings. Physical discomfort might be offset by building standing time slowly and incorporating more sit-stand transitions. Psychological discomfort may be lessened by notifying other attendees about intentions to stand. Organisational buy-in to promotional strategies for standing may be required to dispel perceptions of sitting norms, and to progress a wider workplace health and wellbeing agenda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Marmot A, Eley J: Office Space Planning. 1st edition New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
    1. Ryde G, Brown H, Gilson N, Brown W: Are we chained to our desks? Describing desk-based sitting using a novel measure of occupational sitting. J Phys Act Health. 2014; 11:1318–23. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0480 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, Marmot A, Gardner B, Sawyer A, et al.: Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the Active Buildings study. BMC Pub Health. 2015;15:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rezende L, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López J, Matsudo V, Luiz O: Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e105620 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al.: Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (SBRN)–Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:75 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources