Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199526.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199526. eCollection 2018.

The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage

Affiliations

The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage

Harisharan Luintel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Approximately 15.5% of global forest is controlled by ~1 billion local people and the area under community control is increasing. However, there is limited empirical evidence as to whether community control is effective in providing critical global ecosystem services, such as biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. We assess the effectiveness of one example of community-controlled forest, Nepal's Community Forestry Program (CFP), at providing biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. Using data from 620 randomly selected CFP and non-CFP forest plots, we apply a robust matching method based on covariates to estimate whether CFPs are associated with greater biodiversity conservation or carbon storage. Our results reveal a significant positive effect of CFP on biodiversity, which is robust against the influence of unobserved covariates. Our results also suggest a significant negative effect of the CFP on aboveground tree and sapling carbon (AGC) at the national scale (-15.11 Mg C ha-1). However, the CFP has a mixed effect on carbon across geographic and topographic regions and in forests with different canopy covers. Though there were no significant effects of the CFP on AGC at lower altitudes, in the Terai or hill regions, and under closed canopies, there were positive effects in open canopies (25.84 Mg C ha-1) at lower slopes (25.51 Mg C ha-1) and negative effects at higher altitudes (-22.81 Mg C ha-1) and higher slopes (-17.72 Mg C ha-1). Our sensitivity analysis revealed that the positive effects are robust to unobserved covariates, which is not true for the negative results. In aggregate, our results demonstrate that CFP can be an effective forest management strategy to contribute to global ecosystem services such as biodiversity, and to a lesser extent carbon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of sample plots across the country.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rights and Resources Initiative (2014) What Future for Reform? Progress and Slowdown in Forest Tenure Reform since 2002. Washington DC.
    1. Charnley S., & Poe M.R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301–336.
    1. Larson A.M., & Soto F. (2008) Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 213–239.
    1. Mittermeier R.A., Robles-Gil P., Hoffman M., Pilgrim J.D., Brooks T., Mittermeier C.G., et al. (2004). Hotspots revisited: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions Mexico City, Mexico: Conservation International in association with CEMEX.
    1. Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P.E., Kurz WA, et al. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988–993. doi: 10.1126/science.1201609 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types