The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
- PMID: 29944704
- PMCID: PMC6019746
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199526
The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
Abstract
Approximately 15.5% of global forest is controlled by ~1 billion local people and the area under community control is increasing. However, there is limited empirical evidence as to whether community control is effective in providing critical global ecosystem services, such as biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. We assess the effectiveness of one example of community-controlled forest, Nepal's Community Forestry Program (CFP), at providing biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. Using data from 620 randomly selected CFP and non-CFP forest plots, we apply a robust matching method based on covariates to estimate whether CFPs are associated with greater biodiversity conservation or carbon storage. Our results reveal a significant positive effect of CFP on biodiversity, which is robust against the influence of unobserved covariates. Our results also suggest a significant negative effect of the CFP on aboveground tree and sapling carbon (AGC) at the national scale (-15.11 Mg C ha-1). However, the CFP has a mixed effect on carbon across geographic and topographic regions and in forests with different canopy covers. Though there were no significant effects of the CFP on AGC at lower altitudes, in the Terai or hill regions, and under closed canopies, there were positive effects in open canopies (25.84 Mg C ha-1) at lower slopes (25.51 Mg C ha-1) and negative effects at higher altitudes (-22.81 Mg C ha-1) and higher slopes (-17.72 Mg C ha-1). Our sensitivity analysis revealed that the positive effects are robust to unobserved covariates, which is not true for the negative results. In aggregate, our results demonstrate that CFP can be an effective forest management strategy to contribute to global ecosystem services such as biodiversity, and to a lesser extent carbon.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Linking Attitudes, Policy, and Forest Cover Change in Buffer Zone Communities of Chitwan National Park, Nepal.Environ Manage. 2016 Jun;57(6):1292-303. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0682-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Environ Manage. 2016. PMID: 26920157
-
Can joint carbon and biodiversity management in tropical agroforestry landscapes be optimized?PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047192. Epub 2012 Oct 15. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23077569 Free PMC article.
-
A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.Ecol Appl. 2011 Sep;21(6):1902-24. doi: 10.1890/10-0697.1. Ecol Appl. 2011. PMID: 21939033
-
Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity.Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):92-109. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13087. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Glob Chang Biol. 2016. PMID: 26390852 Review.
-
Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix.Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1050-1064. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01248-0. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Ambio. 2020. PMID: 31529355 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Aboveground carbon of community-managed Chirpine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Nepal based on stand types and geographic aspects.PeerJ. 2019 Mar 8;7:e6494. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6494. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 30867985 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of climate change on distribution of common leopard (Panthera pardus) and its implication on conservation and conflict in Nepal.Heliyon. 2023 Jan 5;9(1):e12807. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12807. eCollection 2023 Jan. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 36660456 Free PMC article.
-
Forest conservation effectiveness of community forests may decline in the future: Evidence from Cambodia.PNAS Nexus. 2023 Sep 28;2(10):pgad320. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad320. eCollection 2023 Oct. PNAS Nexus. 2023. PMID: 37908560 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the Barriers to Community Forestry Delivering on its Potential: An Illustration From Two Heterogeneous Districts in Nepal.Environ Manage. 2020 Apr;65(4):463-477. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01224-0. Epub 2020 Feb 13. Environ Manage. 2020. PMID: 32055914
-
Impact of community-based forest restoration on stand structural attributes, aboveground biomass and carbon stock compared to state-managed forests in tropical ecosystems of Sri Lanka.PeerJ. 2024 Sep 26;12:e18176. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18176. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39346074 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rights and Resources Initiative (2014) What Future for Reform? Progress and Slowdown in Forest Tenure Reform since 2002. Washington DC.
-
- Charnley S., & Poe M.R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301–336.
-
- Larson A.M., & Soto F. (2008) Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 213–239.
-
- Mittermeier R.A., Robles-Gil P., Hoffman M., Pilgrim J.D., Brooks T., Mittermeier C.G., et al. (2004). Hotspots revisited: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions Mexico City, Mexico: Conservation International in association with CEMEX.
-
- Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P.E., Kurz WA, et al. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988–993. doi: 10.1126/science.1201609 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous