End-of-life decisions and practices for very preterm infants in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation of Belgium
- PMID: 29945564
- PMCID: PMC6020374
- DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1168-x
End-of-life decisions and practices for very preterm infants in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation of Belgium
Abstract
Background: Very preterm birth (24 to < 32 week's gestation) is a major public health issue due to its prevalence, the clinical and ethical questions it raises and the associated costs. It raises two major clinical and ethical dilemma: (i) during the perinatal period, whether or not to actively manage a baby born very prematurely and (ii) during the postnatal period, whether or not to continue a curative treatment plan initiated at birth. The Wallonia-Brussels Federation in Belgium counts 11 neonatal intensive care units.
Methods: An inventory of key practices was compiled on the basis of an online questionnaire that was sent to the 65 neonatologists working in these units. The questionnaire investigated care-related decisions and practices during the antenatal, perinatal and postnatal periods, as well as personal opinions on the possibility of standardising and/or legislating for end-of-life decisions and practices. The participation rate was 89% (n = 58).
Results: The results show a high level of homogeneity pointing to overall agreement on the main principles governing curative practice and the gestational age that can be actively managed given the current state of knowledge. There was, however, greater diversity regarding principles governing the transition to end-of-life care, as well as opinions about the need for a common protocol or law to govern such practices.
Conclusion: Our results reflect the uncertainty inherent in the complex and diverse situations that are encountered in this extreme area of clinical practice, and call for qualitative research and expert debates to further document and make recommendations for best practices regarding several "gray zones" of end-of-life care in neonatology, so that high quality palliative care may be granted to all neonates concerned with end-of-life decisions.
Keywords: Belgium; End-of-life; NICU; Preterm birth; Survey.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Advice was sought from the Ethics Committee of Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc. Following their advice, ethical approval and consent to participate were deemed unnecessary for this study. Indeed, our study did not fall within the scope of the Belgian Law of 7 May 2004 on Human Experiments, as it did not involve any patients nor patients’ relatives, nor did it require that patient data be shared with the researchers. However, the ethics committees of the 11 participating neonatal care units were informed of the study by their respective representatives in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z. BMC Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29471821 Free PMC article.
-
End-of-Life Decisions 20 Years after EURONIC: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices, Attitudes, and Treatment Choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.J Pediatr. 2019 Apr;207:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064. Epub 2019 Feb 13. J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30772016
-
Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 20 years after the EURONIC study: A French survey.Arch Pediatr. 2019 Sep;26(6):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 25. Arch Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31353145
-
Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations.Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Oct 18;141:w13280. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13280. eCollection 2011. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011. PMID: 22009720 Review.
-
Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology.Semin Perinatol. 2014 Feb;38(1):38-46. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.07.007. Semin Perinatol. 2014. PMID: 24468568 Review.
Cited by
-
Conversations About End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology: Do Doctors and Parents Implement Shared Decision-Making?Front Pediatr. 2022 May 23;10:897014. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.897014. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35676897 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' attitudes toward caring for terminally ill neonates and their families in Iran: a cross-sectional study.J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2021 Feb 16;14:4. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v14i4.5651. eCollection 2021. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2021. PMID: 34849213 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00702-7. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 34563198 Free PMC article.
-
National Divergences in Perinatal Palliative Care Guidelines and Training in Tertiary NICUs.Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 14;9:673545. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.673545. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34336737 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083938. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33918554 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Larroque B, Samain H, Groupe E. Epipage study: mortality of very premature infants and state of progress at follow up. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2001;30(6 Suppl):S33–S41. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous