Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 15;19(Suppl 1):46.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0285-2.

Right to health and social justice in Bangladesh: ethical dilemmas and obligations of state and non-state actors to ensure health for urban poor

Affiliations
Review

Right to health and social justice in Bangladesh: ethical dilemmas and obligations of state and non-state actors to ensure health for urban poor

Sohana Shafique et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: The world is urbanizing rapidly; more than half the world's population now lives in urban areas, leading to significant transition in lifestyles and social behaviours globally. While offering many advantages, urban environments also concentrate health risks and introduce health hazards for the poor. In Bangladesh, although many public policies are directed towards equity and protecting people's rights, these are not comprehensively and inclusively applied in ways that prioritize the health rights of citizens. The country is thus facing many issues that raise moral and ethical concerns.

Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted between October 2016 and November 2017 on issues related to social justice, health, and human rights in urban Bangladesh. The key questions discussed here are: i) ethical dilemmas and inclusion of the urban poor to pursue social justice; and ii) the ethical obligations and moral responsibilities of the state and non-state sectors in serving Bangladesh's urban poor. Using a Rawlsian theory of equality of opportunity to ensure social justice, we identified key health-related ethical issues in the country's rapidly changing urban landscape, especially among the poor.

Results: We examined ethical dilemmas in Bangladesh's health system through the rural-urban divide and the lack of coordination among implementing agencies. The unregulated profusion of the private sector and immoral practices of service providers result in high out-of-pocket expenditures for urban poor, leading to debt and further impoverishment. We also highlight policy and programmatic gaps, as well as entry points for safeguarding the right to health for Bangladeshi citizens.

Conclusions: The urban health system in Bangladesh needs a reform in which state and non-state actors should work together, understanding and acknowledging their moral responsibilities for improving the health of the urban poor by engaging multiple sectors. The social determinants of health should be taken into account when formulating policies and programs to achieve universal health coverage and ensure social justice for the urban poor in Bangladesh.

Keywords: Bangladesh; Ethics; Global health; Health and human rights; Right to health; Social determinants of health; Social justice; Urban health; Urban poor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:981–984. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruger JP. Ethics of the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2004;364:1092–1097. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17067-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen A. Why health equity? Health Econ. 2002;11:659–666. doi: 10.1002/hec.762. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freedman LP. Reflections on emerging frameworks of health and human rights. Health Hum Rights. 1995;1:314–348. doi: 10.2307/4065246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations . The universal declaration of human rights. 1948.

Publication types

Grants and funding