Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 13:7:F1000 Faculty Rev-736.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13980.1. eCollection 2018.

Recent advances in the detection of repeat expansions with short-read next-generation sequencing

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in the detection of repeat expansions with short-read next-generation sequencing

Melanie Bahlo et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STRs), also known as microsatellites, are commonly defined as consisting of tandemly repeated nucleotide motifs of 2-6 base pairs in length. STRs appear throughout the human genome, and about 239,000 are documented in the Simple Repeats Track available from the UCSC (University of California, Santa Cruz) genome browser. STRs vary in size, producing highly polymorphic markers commonly used as genetic markers. A small fraction of STRs (about 30 loci) have been associated with human disease whereby one or both alleles exceed an STR-specific threshold in size, leading to disease. Detection of repeat expansions is currently performed with polymerase chain reaction-based assays or with Southern blots for large expansions. The tests are expensive and time-consuming and are not always conclusive, leading to lengthy diagnostic journeys for patients, potentially including missed diagnoses. The advent of whole exome and whole genome sequencing has identified the genetic cause of many genetic disorders; however, analysis pipelines are focused primarily on the detection of short nucleotide variations and short insertions and deletions (indels). Until recently, repeat expansions, with the exception of the smallest expansion (SCA6), were not detectable in next-generation short-read sequencing datasets and would have been ignored in most analyses. In the last two years, four analysis methods with accompanying software (ExpansionHunter, exSTRa, STRetch, and TREDPARSE) have been released. Although a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of these methods across all known repeat expansions is still lacking, it is clear that these methods are a valuable addition to any existing analysis pipeline. Here, we detail how to assess short-read data for evidence of expansions, reviewing all four methods and outlining their strengths and weaknesses. Implementation of these methods should lead to increased diagnostic yield of repeat expansion disorders for known STR loci and has the potential to detect novel repeat expansions.

Keywords: bioinformatics; repeat expansion disorders; short tandem repeats; short-read sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Detecting repeat expansions with short-read sequencing data.
Depicted are three scenarios: ( I) a short repeat expansion where the repeat expansion is less than 150 base pairs (bp), or smaller than a read; ( II) a medium-size repeat expansion where the repeat expansion is between 150 and 350 bp; and ( III) a large repeat expansion, where the repeat expansion is greater than 350 bp. For each of the three panels, IIII, the top line of DNA sequence depicts the reference sequence, and the bottom line depicts the (not known) repeat expansion size sequence. Red segments in reads signify repeat sequence. Evidence from reads varies according to the repeat size. For all three scenarios, there is information in reads that map into the repeat (A) but for scenario I occasional reads span the expanded allele (B), giving information about the size of the expanded allele. In scenario II, some read fragments can span expanded allele and can also be used for inference. For large expansions, some read fragments stem entirely from the expanded alleles. These may not be unambiguously mapped and are exploited only by ExpansionHunter (large motifs only) and TREDPARSE (based on fragment size information).

References

    1. Warby SC, Visscher H, Collins JA, et al. : HTT haplotypes contribute to differences in Huntington disease prevalence between Europe and East Asia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(5):561–6. 10.1038/ejhg.2010.229 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mootha VV, Gong X, Ku HC, et al. : Association and familial segregation of CTG18.1 trinucleotide repeat expansion of TCF4 gene in Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(1):33–42. 10.1167/iovs.13-12611 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishiura H, Doi K, Mitsui J, et al. : Expansions of intronic TTTCA and TTTTA repeats in benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2018;50(4):581–90. 10.1038/s41588-018-0067-2 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Warner JP, Barron LH, Goudie D, et al. : A general method for the detection of large CAG repeat expansions by fluorescent PCR. J Med Genet. 1996;33(12):1022–6. 10.1136/jmg.33.12.1022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao M, Cheah FSH, Chen M, et al. : Improved high sensitivity screen for Huntington disease using a one-step triplet-primed PCR and melting curve assay. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180984. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180984 - DOI - PMC - PubMed