With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?
- PMID: 29946919
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6289-7
With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown that hospital type impacts patient outcomes, but no studies have examined hospital differences in outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for segmental colectomies.
Methods: The 2010-2014 National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients undergoing segmental colectomy for non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma. Descriptive statistics characterized MIS utilization by hospital type. Multivariable models were used to examine the effect of hospital type on outcomes after MIS. Survival probability was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: 80,922 patients underwent MIS segmental colectomy for colon cancer from 2010 to 2014. From 2010 to 2014, the number of MIS segmental colectomies increased by 157% at academic hospitals, 151% at comprehensive hospitals, and 153% at community hospitals. Compared to academic hospitals, community and comprehensive hospitals had greater adjusted odds of positive margins (Community OR 1.525, 95% Confidence Interval 1.233-1.885; Comprehensive OR 1.216, 95% CI 1.041-1.42), incomplete number of lymph nodes analyzed (< 12 LNs) from surgery (Community OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.98-2.32; Comprehensive OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34-1.51), and greater 30-day mortality (Community OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.78; Comprehensive OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17-1.59). Patient survival probability was higher at academic hospitals at 5 years (Academic 69% vs. Comprehensive 66% vs. Community 63%, p < 0.001). Community hospitals and comprehensive hospitals had significantly higher risk of adjusted long-term mortality (Community HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.19-1.37; p < 0.001; Comprehensive HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.20; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Despite widespread use of laparoscopic oncologic surgery, short- and long-term outcomes from MIS for segmental colectomy are superior at academic hospitals. This difference may be due to superior perioperative oncologic technique and surgical outcomes at academic hospitals. Our data provide important information for patients, referring physicians, and surgeons about the significance of hospital type in management of colon cancer.
Keywords: Colorectal; Hospital type; Malignancy; Outcomes; Resection.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of open and minimally invasive approaches to colon cancer resection in compliance with 12 regional lymph node harvest quality measure.J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;123(4):986-996. doi: 10.1002/jso.26298. Epub 2021 Feb 12. J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33577718
-
Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):460-470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6319-5. Epub 2018 Jul 2. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 29967992
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2894-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5999-6. Epub 2017 Dec 22. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29273877
-
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):431-38. Minerva Chir. 2003. PMID: 14603155 Review.
-
Similar length of colon is removed regardless of localization in right-sided colonic cancer surgery.ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;88(7-8):E568-E572. doi: 10.1111/ans.14276. Epub 2017 Dec 8. ANZ J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29219230 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.BJS Open. 2022 Sep 2;6(5):zrac110. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac110. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 36124901 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and feasibility of repeat laparoscopic colorectal resection: a matched case-control study.Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2120-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06995-5. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31324972
-
Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?Colorectal Dis. 2025 May;27(5):e70111. doi: 10.1111/codi.70111. Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40387083 Free PMC article.
-
Fragmentation of Care in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;31(1):645-654. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14318-1. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 37737968
-
Learning curve for robotic rectal cancer resection at a community-based teaching institution.J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):3005-3012. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01671-2. Epub 2023 Nov 3. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37922066 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):183–188 - PubMed
-
- Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150 - PubMed
-
- Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources