Just How Attractive is the ATTRACT Trial?

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health issue; deep vein thrombosis (DVT) affects about 1/1000 patients. Each year, VTE kills more patients in Western Europe than breast cancer, prostate cancer, acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and road traffic accidents combined and is responsible for the deaths of approximately 370,000 European citizens (Cohen et al. in Thromb Haemost 98:756-764, 2007; Bĕlohlávek et al. in Exp Clin Cardiol 18(2):129-138, 2013). The recently published ATTRACT trial (Acute Venous Thrombosis Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-directed Thrombolysis) (Vedantham et al. in N Engl J Med 377:2240-2252, 2017) concluded that the addition of catheter-directed thrombolysis to standard therapy with anticoagulation and compression stockings offers no significant clinical benefit over standard therapy in terms of reduction in the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) at 2 years. It is the largest, prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) and represents the culmination over a decade of planning, execution and analysis. In this opinion article, we analyse why it was needed, what it demonstrated, some limitations, and the directions in which this important publication will take us.

Keywords: Catheter directed thrombolysis; Deep venous thrombosis; Pharmaco-Mechnical venous thrombectomy; Review.