Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1206-1212.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy070.

Unstructured clinical documentation reflecting cognitive and behavioral dysfunction: toward an EHR-based phenotype for cognitive impairment

Affiliations

Unstructured clinical documentation reflecting cognitive and behavioral dysfunction: toward an EHR-based phenotype for cognitive impairment

Andrea L Gilmore-Bykovskyi et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Despite increased risk for negative outcomes, cognitive impairment (CI) is greatly under-detected during hospitalization. While automated EHR-based phenotypes have potential to improve recognition of CI, they are hindered by widespread under-diagnosis of underlying etiologies such as dementia-limiting the utility of more precise structured data elements. This study examined unstructured data on symptoms of CI in the acute-care EHRs of hip and stroke fracture patients with dementia from two hospitals. Clinician reviewers identified and classified unstructured EHR data using standardized criteria. Relevant narrative text was descriptively characterized and evaluated for key terminology. Most patient EHRs (90%) had narrative text reflecting cognitive and/or behavioral dysfunction common in CI that were reliably classified (κ 0.82). The majority of statements reflected vague descriptions of cognitive/behavioral dysfunction as opposed to diagnostic terminology. Findings from this preliminary derivation study suggest that clinicians use specific terminology in unstructured EHR fields to describe common symptoms of CI. This terminology can inform the design of EHR-based phenotypes for CI and merits further investigation in more diverse, robustly characterized samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification and classification of unstructured EHR data describing symptoms of cognitive impairment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Characteristics of narrative text describing cognitive impairment. (A) Symptoms of cognitive impairment represented in narrative text (B) Use of diagnostic terminology in descriptions of cognitive impairment (C) Proportion of narrative text describing multiple symptoms.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Key words and phrases from narrative text by classification category.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Lange E, Verhaak PF, van der Meer K.. Prevalence, presentation and prognosis of delirium in older people in the population, at home and in long term care: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013; 282: 127–34. - PubMed
    1. Plassman BL, Langa KM, McCammon RJ.. Incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment, not dementia in the United States. Ann Neurol 2011; 703: 418–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laurila JV, Pitkala KH, Strandberg TE, Tilvis RS.. Detection and documentation of dementia and delirium in acute geriatric wards. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004; 261: 31–5. - PubMed
    1. Boustani M, Baker MS, Campbell N, et al. Impact and recognition of cognitive impairment among hospitalized elders. J Hosp Med 2010; 52: 69–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 73: 263–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types