Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Aug;45(4):705-711.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0968-x. Epub 2018 Jun 9.

"Second-look" laparotomy: warranted, or contributor to excessive open abdomens?

Affiliations
Observational Study

"Second-look" laparotomy: warranted, or contributor to excessive open abdomens?

Natasha Hansraj et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: The overuse of temporary abdominal closure and second look (SL) laparotomy in emergency general surgery (EGS) cases has been questioned in the recent literature. In an effort to hopefully decrease the number of open abdomen (OA) patients, we hypothesize that reviewing our cases, many of these SL patients could be managed with single-stage operative therapy and thus decrease the number of OA patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from Jun 2013-Jun 2014, evaluating EGS patients managed with an OA who required bowel resection in either index or SL laparotomy. Demographics, clinical variables, complications and mortality were collected. Fisher's exact t test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: During this time frame, 96 patients were managed with OA and 59 patients required a bowel resection. 55 (57%) of those required one bowel resection at the index operation with 4 (4.2%) only requiring one bowel resection at the second operation. In the patients requiring bowel resections, 18 (30%) required a resection at SL. At SL laparotomy, resection was required for questionably viable bowel at the index operation 60% (11), whereas 39% (7) had normal appearing bowel. Indications for resection at SL laparotomy included evolution of existing ischemia, new onset ischemia, staple line revision, and "other". 23 patients (39%) were hemodynamically unstable, contributing to the need for temporary abdominal closure. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock was the only predictor of need for further resection. Complications and mortality were similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Almost one-fifth of the patients undergoing SL laparotomy for open abdomen required bowel resections, with 6.8% of those having normal appearing bowel at index operation, therefore in select EGS patients, SL laparotomy is a reasonable strategy.

Keywords: And mesenteric ischemia; Bowel ischemia; Bowel resection; Relook laparotomy; Second look.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Surg. 2000 Nov;166(11):872-7 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Feb;35(2):246-53 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):445-52 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2005 May;29(5):645-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Today. 2006;36(3):241-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources