Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Jan;29(1):22-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5552-6. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)

Manoj Mannil et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to apply texture analysis (TA) on paraspinal musculature in T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance images (MRI) of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients and correlate the findings with clinical outcome measures.

Methods: Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in the multi-centric Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS). All patients received a T2w MRI, from which we selected axial images perpendicular to the intervertebral disc at level L3/4 for TA. Regions-of-interest (ROI) were drawn of the paraspinal musculature and 304 TA features/ ROI were calculated. As clinical outcome measurements, we analysed three commonly applied measures: Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). We used two machine learning-based classifiers: Decision table, and k-nearest neighbours (k-NN).

Results: We observed no meaningful correlation between TA in paraspinal musculature and the two clinical outcome measures SSM symptoms and SSM function, while a moderate correlation was observed regarding the outcome measures RMDQ (k-NN: r = 0.56) and NRS (Decision Table: r = 0.72).

Conclusions: In conclusion, MR TA is a viable tool to quantify medical images and illustrate correlations of microarchitectural changes invisible to a human reader with potential clinical impact.

Key points: • TA is feasible on paraspinal musculature using MRI. • TA on paraspinal musculature correlates with SSM and RMDQ. • TA may enable a statement regarding clinical impact of imaging findings.

Keywords: Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscles; Spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):317-20 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 1;25(7):819-28 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Feb 1;27(3):306-12 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 1;27(9):975-83 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):324-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources