Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;117(8):2359-2378.
doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-5958-8. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

A review of wildlife tourism and meta-analysis of parasitism in Africa's national parks and game reserves

Affiliations
Review

A review of wildlife tourism and meta-analysis of parasitism in Africa's national parks and game reserves

Paul Olalekan Odeniran et al. Parasitol Res. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

The recent increase of parasitic diseases associated with wildlife tourism can be traced to human contact with wildlife and intense modification of wildlife habitat. The continental estimates of parasitic diseases among visited wildlife-tourists and mammalian wildlife present in conservation areas are lacking; therefore, a general review was necessary to provide insights into Africa's parasitic disease burden and transmission between humans and wildlife. A two-step analysis was conducted with searches in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and Global Health. All diseases reported without prevalence were grouped and analysed as categorical data while meta-analysis of prevalence rates of parasitic diseases in wildlife from national parks and reserves in Africa was conducted. Only 4.7% of the tourist centres reported routine wildlife diagnosis for parasitic diseases. Disease intensity shows that cryptosporidiosis and seven other parasitic diseases were observed in both human and wildlife; however, no significant difference in intensity between human and wildlife hosts was observed. Schistosomiasis intensity reports showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) while entamoebiasis showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in humans as compared to wildlife. Visiting tourists were more infected with malaria, while wildlife was more infected with parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE). The meta-analysis of wildlife revealed the highest prevalence of PGE with mixed parasites and lowest prevalence of Giardia spp. at 99.9 and 5.7%, respectively. The zoonotic and socioeconomic impact of some of these parasites could pose a severe public threat to tourism. Pre- and post-travel clinical examinations are important for tourists while routine examination, treatment and rational surveillance are important for these animals to improve wildlife tourism.

Keywords: Africa; Conservation areas; Parasites; Tourists; Wildlife.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Parasitol. 2005 Oct;35(11-12):1279-94 - PubMed
    1. Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 25;186(3-4):532-7 - PubMed
    1. J Wildl Dis. 2011 Jan;47(1):172-81 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e90203 - PubMed
    1. Harefuah. 2010 Sep;149(9):563-7, 621 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources