Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;27(8):1964-1971.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5660-7. Epub 2018 Jun 9.

Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density

Affiliations

Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density

Lukas Weiser et al. Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is known to increase their mechanical strength. Aim was to evaluate the impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fatigue strength in dependence of the bone mineral density (BMD).

Methods: Twenty-one human L2 vertebral bodies from donors between 19 and 96 years of age were used for in vitro experiments. BMD was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Two pedicle screws were inserted in each specimen and unilaterally augmented with bone cement. Fatigue testing was performed using a cranio-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic load (0.5 Hz) with increasing compression force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles). Results were evaluated for the BMD groups: normal: BMD > 120 mg/cm3, osteopenic: BMD 80-120 mg/cm3, and osteoporotic: BMD < 80 mg/cm3 bone mass.

Results: There was a significant correlation between fatigue force and BMD for the non-augmented and augmented screws (non-augmented R2 = 0.839, p < 0.001; augmented R2 = 0.551, p < 0.001). There was a significantly increased fatigue strength of the augmented screws over the non-augmented screws in the osteoporotic group (p = 0.001), while the differences in the other groups were not significant (normal p = 0.818/osteopenic p = 0.132).

Conclusions: The benefit of pedicle screw cement augmentation significantly depends on the bone mineral density and has the greatest extent of increased fatigue strength in osteoporotic vertebrae. Preoperative measurement of the BMD is strongly recommended to predict the benefit of augmentation and reinforce the decision for cement augmentation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords: BMD; Bone mineral density; Cement augmentation; Osteoporosis; Pedicle screw; Spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke HJ (2015) Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 24:1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldhahn J, Suhm N, Goldhahn S, Blauth M, Hanson B (2008) Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation–a systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int 19:761–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0515-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, Whitecloud TS 3rd, Cook SD (1994) Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2415–2420 - DOI
    1. Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K (1991) An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:1335–1341 - DOI
    1. Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E, Inaba H, Shimada Y, Murai H (1993) Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:2240–2245 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources