Perceived Role and Expectations of Health Care Providers in Return to Work
- PMID: 29948470
- DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9781-y
Perceived Role and Expectations of Health Care Providers in Return to Work
Abstract
Purpose Health care providers (HCPs) play an important role in return to work (RTW) and in the workers' compensation system. However, HCPs may feel unsure about their responsibilities in the RTW process and experience difficulty making recommendations about RTW readiness and limitations. This study examines the ways in which HCPs and case managers (CMs) perceive HCPs role in the RTW process, and how similarities and differences between these views, in turn, inform expectations of HCPs. Methods In-depth interviews were conducted with 69 HCPs and 34 CMs from 4 provinces. Data were double coded and a thematic, inductive analysis was carried out to develop key themes. Findings The main role of HCPs was to diagnose injury and provide patients with appropriate treatment. In addition, the majority of HCPs and CMs viewed providing medical information to workers' compensation board (WCB) and the general encouragement of RTW as important roles played by HCPs. There was less clarity, and at times disagreement, about the scope of HCPs' role in providing medical information to WCB and encouraging RTW, such as the type of information they should provide and the timelines for RTW. Conclusion Interviews suggest that different role expectations may stem from differing perspectives of HCPs and the CMs had regarding RTW. A comprehensive discussion between WCB decision-makers and HCPs is needed, with an end goal of reaching consensus regarding roles and responsibilities in the RTW process. The findings highlight the importance of establishing clearer role expectations.
Keywords: Health care providers; Physicians; Qualitative; Return to work; Roles; Workers’ compensation.
Similar articles
-
Healthcare providers' experience with the management of mental health conditions in the context of Workers' Compensation.Work. 2018;59(3):449-462. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182695. Work. 2018. PMID: 29630586
-
The "toxic dose" of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected.J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Sep;20(3):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9229-5. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20140752
-
Health-care providers' perspectives on factors influencing return-to-work after surgery for nontraumatic conditions of the upper extremity.J Hand Ther. 2020 Jan-Mar;33(1):87-95.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.011. Epub 2019 Mar 8. J Hand Ther. 2020. PMID: 30857893
-
The Role of the Orthopaedic Surgeon in Workers' Compensation Cases.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;25(3):e45-e52. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00499. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID: 28199293 Review.
-
The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker's expectations for return to work.Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1808-16. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.979299. Epub 2015 Jul 9. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25374043 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Smart Work Injury Management (SWIM) System to Assist Case Managers in Predicting the Work Disability of Injured Workers.J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(2):320-332. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10199-7. Epub 2024 Jun 14. J Occup Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 38874680 Free PMC article.
-
Primary Care Physicians' Learning Needs in Returning Ill or Injured Workers to Work. A Scoping Review.J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Dec;32(4):591-619. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10043-w. Epub 2022 May 5. J Occup Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 35511378
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources