Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun;22(6):411-423.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1806-1. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Left colon resection with transrectal specimen extraction: current status

Affiliations
Review

Left colon resection with transrectal specimen extraction: current status

D Zattoni et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Full laparoscopic left colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction is proposed as an improvement of the minimally invasive surgical technique. This paper reviews in detail the current status of left-sided colectomy and upper rectum resection with transrectal specimen extraction.

Methods: A systematic review was performed of all types of publications on colorectal resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). We only included studies reporting on left colectomy, sigmoidectomy, and high anterior resection with transrectal specimen extraction (TRSE), excluding transanal (TASE), transvaginal, or transcolonic specimen extraction. Surgical techniques, patient characteristics, and outcomes were reviewed in detail.

Results: Thirty-five papers reported on TRSE (2 randomized clinical trials, 7 case-matched series, 19 case series, 5 case reports, and 2 articles on surgical technique). We found a wide variety of innovative anastomotic and specimen extraction techniques. After excluding duplicates and papers reporting mixed TRSE and TASE results, outcomes in patients undergoing TRSE from 23 publications showed a conversion rate to conventional laparoscopy of 3.7% (21/559), overall morbidity 9.5% (53/559) [major in 2.9% (16/559), intra-abdominal infection in 2.1% (12/559)]. No mortality was reported. Postoperative anal incontinence was rarely reported. Several studies showed a decrease in postoperative pain and some in length of hospital stay.

Conclusions: Colectomy with TRSE is feasible and seems safe in selected patients. Reported outcomes seem in general similar to conventional laparoscopic colectomy with a possible benefit in postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. Obvious selection bias and lack of high quality trials do not allow firm conclusions to be drawn.

Keywords: Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Natural orifice endoscopic surgery; Natural orifice specimen extraction; Transrectal specimen extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1287-91 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):51-6 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1699-702 - PubMed
    1. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Oct;21(5):e235-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Innov. 2010 Jun;17(2):79-84 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources