Comparison of conventional fluid management with PVI-based goal-directed fluid management in elective colorectal surgery
- PMID: 29948666
- PMCID: PMC6420438
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0163-y
Comparison of conventional fluid management with PVI-based goal-directed fluid management in elective colorectal surgery
Abstract
Intraoperative fluid management is quite important in terms of postoperative organ perfusion and complications. Different fluid management protocols are in use for this purpose. Our primary goal was to compare the effects of conventional fluid management (CFM) with the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) protocols on the amount of crystalloids administered, blood lactate, and serum creatinine levels during the intraoperative period. The length of hospital stay was our secondary goal. Seventy ASA I-II elective colorectal surgery patients were randomly assigned to CFM or GDFM for fluid management. The hemodynamic data and the data obtained from ABG were recorded at the end of induction and during the follow-up period at 1 h intervals. In the preoperative period and at 24 h postoperatively, blood samples were taken for the measurement of hemoglobin, Na, K, Cl, serum creatinine, albumin and blood lactate. In the first 24 h after surgery, oliguria and the time of first bowel movement were recorded. Length of hospital stay was also recorded. Intraoperative crystalloid administration and urine output were statistically significantly higher in CFM group (p < 0.001, p: 0.018). The end-surgery fluid balance was significantly lower in Group GDFM. Preoperative and postoperative Na, K, Cl, serum albumin, serum creatinine, lactate and hemoglobin values were similar between the groups. The time to passage of stool was significantly short in Group-GDFM compared to Group-CFM (p = 0.016). The length of hospital stay was found to be similar in both group. PVI-guided GDFM might be an alternative to CFM in ASA I-II patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. However, further studies need to be carried out to search the efficiency and safety of PVI.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Crystalloid fluid; Goal directed fluid management; Pleth variability index.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to the publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management.Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):910-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eb624f. Epub 2010 Aug 12. Anesth Analg. 2010. PMID: 20705785 Clinical Trial.
-
Pleth Variability Index-Based Goal-Directed Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Elective Gynecologic Surgery.Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Jun 28;56(2):220-226. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.81073. eCollection 2022. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022. PMID: 35990294 Free PMC article.
-
Pleth Variability Index Guided Volume Optimisation in Major Gynaecologic Surgery.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 Aug;32(8):980-986. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.08.980. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022. PMID: 35932119 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of goal-directed fluid therapy using transoesophageal Doppler monitoring in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.BJS Open. 2019 Jul 4;3(5):606-616. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50188. eCollection 2019 Oct. BJS Open. 2019. PMID: 31592512 Free PMC article.
-
Goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy in colorectal surgery: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Jul 1. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29972762 Review.
Cited by
-
Is goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic variables alone sufficient to improve clinical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery? A meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2018 Nov 14;22(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2251-2. Crit Care. 2018. PMID: 30428928 Free PMC article.
-
Current Commonly Used Dynamic Parameters and Monitoring Systems for Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: A Review.Yale J Biol Med. 2023 Mar 31;96(1):107-123. doi: 10.59249/JOAP6662. eCollection 2023 Mar. Yale J Biol Med. 2023. PMID: 37009197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2019 Nov 29;2019:3408940. doi: 10.1155/2019/3408940. eCollection 2019. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31871449 Free PMC article.
-
Restricted Versus Liberal Versus Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy for Non-vascular Abdominal Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):e38238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38238. eCollection 2023 Apr. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37261162 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Post-operative outcomes of intra-operative restrictive and conventional fluid management in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(2):239-244. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_19_22. J Minim Access Surg. 2023. PMID: 35915517 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Turkish Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Association (TARD). Perioperative goal directed treatment guideline, Turkey. 2014. https://www.tard.org.tr/assets/kilavuz/8.pdf.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical