Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;25(4):1526-1534.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1496-8.

Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking

Affiliations

Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking

Adam W Qureshi et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the calculation of another's perspective is cognitively efficient, whereas perspective selection (selection of a particular perspective, self or other) is associated with executive function, particularly inhibitory control. However, research has not previously tested how perspective calculation and selection may be associated with another key executive function, working memory. In the present study (N = 54 adult participants), we administered a Level-1 visual perspective task in a dual-task paradigm in which the secondary task required working memory. The results suggest that executive function is associated with both perspective calculation and perspective selection, contrary to previous evidence from similar dual-task studies that had used inhibitory control and attention-based secondary tasks. This contrast may suggest that working memory capacity facilitates perspective-taking. Furthermore, it may follow that the notion of simple perspective-taking is distinct from more the complex and cognitively demanding "theory of mind." Research of this nature warrants further investigation.

Keywords: Dual-tasking; Executive function; Perspective calculation; Perspective selection; Theory of mind; Visual perspective-taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Error rates by task condition, consistency, and perspective (bars = confidence intervals)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response times (in milliseconds) by task condition, consistency, and perspective (bars = confidence intervals)

References

    1. Apperly IA. What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012;65:825–839. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676055. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apperly IA, Butterfill SA. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review. 2009;116:953–970. doi: 10.1037/a0016923. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apperly IA, Samson D, Humphreys GW. Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating neuropsychological evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9:572–577. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon R, Scott RM, He Z. False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird CM, Castelli F, Malik O, Frith U, Husain M. The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on “theory of mind” and cognition. Brain. 2004;127:914–928. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh108. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources