Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 26;15(7):1336.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071336.

Time Spent in Sedentary Behaviour as Discriminant Criterion for Frailty in Older Adults

Affiliations

Time Spent in Sedentary Behaviour as Discriminant Criterion for Frailty in Older Adults

Venicius Dantas da Silva et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse whether time spent in sedentary behaviour was a discriminant criterion for frailty in older adults. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a sample of 457 elderly individuals aged ≥60 years. Frailty was defined as the presence of three or more of the following criteria: Unintentional weight loss, low walking speed at a 4.57 m course, reduced manual grip strength, exhaustion and insufficient physical activity level. Participants were classified into two groups: Non-frail or frail. Exposure to sedentary behaviour was assessed by the time spent sitting during a typical week, according to the adapted version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Descriptive (mean, frequency) and inferential statistics (Poisson regression, Pearson’s Chi-square, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) were used to analyse the data, comparing them to the time-related areas exposed to sedentary behaviour by gender and the presence of fragility. The prevalence of frailty was 22.1% (n = 101). The most accurate cut-off points of sitting time for predicting frailty were >495 min/day (men) or >536 min/day (women). Time spent in sedentary behaviour can be used to indicate fragility in the elderly of both sexes.

Keywords: frailty; roc curve; sedentary behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean daily time exposed to sedentary behaviour as a discriminant criterion for frailty in the elderly. Solid line: Area under the curve limit; Dotted line: Confidence interval of the area under the curve. (A) Men; (B) Women.

References

    1. Ensrud K.E., Ewing S.K., Cawthon P.M., Fink H.A., Taylor B.C., Cauley J.A., Dam T.-T., Marshall L.M., Orwoll E.S., Cummings S.R. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Research Group A comparison of frailty indexes for the prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and mortality in older men. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2009;57:492–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02137.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J., Newman A.B., Hirsch C., Gottdiener J., Seeman T., Tracy R., Kop W.J., Burke G., et al. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rockwood M.R., MacDonald E., Sutton E., Rockwood K., Baron M. Canadian Scleroderma Research Group Frailty index to measure health status in people with systemic sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2014;41:698–705. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chamberlain A.M., Finney Rutten L.J., Manemann S.M., Yawn B.P., Jacobson D.J., Fan C., Grossardt B.R., Roger V.L., St Sauver J.L. Frailty Trajectories in an Elderly Population-Based Cohort. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016;64:285–292. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13944. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blodgett J., Theou O., Kirkland S., Andreou P., Rockwood K. Frailty in relation to sedentary behaviours and moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity. Rev. Clin. Gerontol. 2014;24:239–254. doi: 10.1017/S0959259814000124. - DOI

Publication types