Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 26;18(7):2043.
doi: 10.3390/s18072043.

Multiple Access Control for Cognitive Radio-Based IEEE 802.11ah Networks

Affiliations

Multiple Access Control for Cognitive Radio-Based IEEE 802.11ah Networks

Muhammad Shafiq et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The proliferation of Internet-of-Things (IoT) technology and its reliance on the license-free Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) bands have rendered radio spectrum scarce. The IoT can nevertheless obtain great advantage from Cognitive Radio (CR) technology for efficient use of a spectrum, to be implemented in IEEE 802.11af-based primary networks. However, such networks require a geolocation database and a centralized architecture to communicate white space information on channels. On the other hand, in spectrum sensing, CR presents various challenges such as the Hidden Primary Terminal (HPT) problem. To this end, we focus on the most recently released standard, i.e., IEEE 802.11ah, in which IoT stations can first be classified into multiple groups to reduce collisions and then they can periodically access the channel. Therein, both services are similarly supported by a centralized server that requires signaling overhead to control the groups of stations. In addition, more regroupings are required over time due to the frequent variations in the number of participating stations, which leads to more overhead. In this paper, we propose a new Multiple Access Control (MAC) protocol for CR-based IEEE 802.11ah systems, called Restricted Access with Collision and Interference Resolution (RACIR). We introduce a decentralized group split algorithm that distributes the participating stations into multiple groups based on a probabilistic estimation in order to resolve collisions. Furthermore, we propose a decentralized channel access procedure that avoids the HPT problem and resolves interference with the incumbent receiver. We analyze the performance of our proposed MAC protocol in terms of normalized throughput, packet delay and energy consumption with the Markov model and analytic expressions. The results are quite promising, which makes the RACIR protocol a strong candidate for the CR-based IoT environment.

Keywords: CSMA/CA; IoT; carrier sensing; dynamic spectrum access; spectrum sensing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Internet-connected devices from 2015 to 2025.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IEEE 802.11ah AID hierarchy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IEEE 802.11ah access mechanism.
Figure 4
Figure 4
System model.
Figure 5
Figure 5
RACIR access mechanism in all possible events.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Markov chain model of the backoff procedure.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Emulation of all the possible events in a RACIR system.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Throughput without grouping the stations.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Estimated number of stations vs. true number of stations.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Throughput with grouping of stations (at various n0s).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Throughput vs. activity rate of Primary Users.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Delay vs. the number of stations (at various W0s).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Delay vs. the number of stations (at various Ms).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Performance comparisons between CR-CSMA/CA and RACIR protocols in a super-dense environment.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Performance comparisons between CR-CSMA/CA and RACIR protocols in a super-dense environment.

References

    1. Miao G., Zander J., Sung K.W., Slimane S.B. Fundamentals of Mobile Data Networks. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2016.
    1. Csurgai-Horvath L., Rieger I., Kertesz J. A Survey of the DVB-T Spectrum: Opportunities for Cognitive Mobile Users. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2016;2016:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2016/3234618. - DOI
    1. Mehdawi M., Riley N., Paulson K., Fanan A., Ammar M. Spectrum occupancy survey in HULL-UK for cognitive radio applications: Measurement and analysis. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2013;2:231–236.
    1. Patil K., Prasad R., Skouby K. A survey of worldwide spectrum occupancy measurement campaigns for cognitive radio; Proceedings of the International Conference on Devices and Communications (ICDeCom); Mesra, India. 24–25 February 2011; pp. 1–5.
    1. Palattella M.R., Dohler M., Grieco A., Rizzo G., Torsner J., Engel T., Ladid L. Internet of things in the 5G era: Enablers, architecture, and business models. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2016;34:510–527. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2016.2525418. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources