Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Dec;27(12):1000-1007.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study

Anne Marie J W M Weggelaar-Jansen et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Several countries have national policies and programmes requiring hospitals to use quality and safety (QS) indicators. To present an overview of these indicators, hospital-wide QS (HWQS) dashboards are designed. There is little evidence how these dashboards are developed. The challenges faced to develop these dashboards in Dutch hospitals were retrospectively studied.

Methods: 24 focus group interviews were conducted: 12 with hospital managers (n=25; 39.7%) and 12 support staff (n=38; 60.3%) in 12 of the largest Dutch hospitals. Open and axial codings were applied consecutively to analyse the data collected.

Results: A heuristic tool for the general development process for HWQS dashboards containing five phases was identified. In phase 1, hospitals make inventories to determine the available data and focus too much on quantitative data relevant for accountability. In phase 2, hospitals develop dashboard content by translating data into meaningful indicators for different users, which is not easy due to differing demands. In phase 3, hospitals search for layouts that depict the dashboard content suited for users with different cognitive abilities and analytical skills. In phase 4, hospitals try to integrate dashboards into organisational structures to ensure that data are systematically reviewed and acted on. In phase 5, hospitals want to improve the flexibility of their dashboards to make this adaptable under differing circumstances.

Conclusion: The literature on dashboards addresses the technical and content aspects of dashboards, but overlooks the organisational development process. This study shows how technical and organisational aspects are relevant in development processes.

Keywords: governance; healthcare quality improvement; performance measures; quality measurement; report cards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weiner BJ, Alexander JA. Hospital governance and quality of care: a critical review of transitional roles. Med Care Rev 1993;50:375–410. 10.1177/002570879305000402 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jha A, Epstein A. Hospital governance and the quality of care. Health Aff 2010;29:182–7. 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0297 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller T, Leatherman S. The National Quality Forum: a ’me-too' or a breakthrough in quality measurement and reporting? Health Aff 1999;18:233–7. 10.1377/hlthaff.18.6.233 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nigam R, Mackinnon NJ, U D, et al. . Development of canadian safety indicators for medication use. Healthc Q 2008;11:47–53. 10.12927/hcq.2008.19649 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyce N, McNeil J, Graves D, et al. . Quality and outcome indicators for acute health care services. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997:106 Report No: 97.01.

Publication types

MeSH terms