Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study
- PMID: 29950323
- PMCID: PMC6288703
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784
Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study
Abstract
Background: Several countries have national policies and programmes requiring hospitals to use quality and safety (QS) indicators. To present an overview of these indicators, hospital-wide QS (HWQS) dashboards are designed. There is little evidence how these dashboards are developed. The challenges faced to develop these dashboards in Dutch hospitals were retrospectively studied.
Methods: 24 focus group interviews were conducted: 12 with hospital managers (n=25; 39.7%) and 12 support staff (n=38; 60.3%) in 12 of the largest Dutch hospitals. Open and axial codings were applied consecutively to analyse the data collected.
Results: A heuristic tool for the general development process for HWQS dashboards containing five phases was identified. In phase 1, hospitals make inventories to determine the available data and focus too much on quantitative data relevant for accountability. In phase 2, hospitals develop dashboard content by translating data into meaningful indicators for different users, which is not easy due to differing demands. In phase 3, hospitals search for layouts that depict the dashboard content suited for users with different cognitive abilities and analytical skills. In phase 4, hospitals try to integrate dashboards into organisational structures to ensure that data are systematically reviewed and acted on. In phase 5, hospitals want to improve the flexibility of their dashboards to make this adaptable under differing circumstances.
Conclusion: The literature on dashboards addresses the technical and content aspects of dashboards, but overlooks the organisational development process. This study shows how technical and organisational aspects are relevant in development processes.
Keywords: governance; healthcare quality improvement; performance measures; quality measurement; report cards.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37307058 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical dashboard development and use for academic detailing in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar-Apr;59(2S):S96-S103.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Feb 1. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019. PMID: 30713078
-
Insights from staff nurses and managers on unit-specific nursing performance dashboards: a qualitative study.BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1001-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002595. Epub 2014 Sep 5. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014. PMID: 25193341
-
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 10;12:e59828. doi: 10.2196/59828. JMIR Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 39656991 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital performance dashboards: a literature review.J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):385-406. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2017-0088. J Health Organ Manag. 2017. PMID: 28686130 Review.
Cited by
-
Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37307058 Free PMC article.
-
Designing a Real-Time Medication Intake and Adherence Dashboard: Features, Functionality, and Data Display to Meet the Needs of Patients, Care Partners and Healthcare Providers.J Med Syst. 2025 May 6;49(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02189-w. J Med Syst. 2025. PMID: 40327173
-
Measurement and monitoring patient safety in prehospital care: a systematic review.Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 5;33(1):mzab013. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab013. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021. PMID: 33459774 Free PMC article.
-
How do we measure organisational wellness? Development of a comprehensive patient-centred and employee-centred visual analytical solution.BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4):e002081. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002081. BMJ Open Qual. 2022. PMID: 36588304 Free PMC article.
-
Real-Time Monitoring System to Manage Mental Healthcare Emergency Unit.Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):344-350. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.344. Epub 2020 Oct 31. Healthc Inform Res. 2020. PMID: 33190469 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boyce N, McNeil J, Graves D, et al. . Quality and outcome indicators for acute health care services. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997:106 Report No: 97.01.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical