Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;138(1):225-244.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1650-0. Epub 2017 May 23.

Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing

Affiliations

Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing

Narasimha D Rao et al. Soc Indic Res. 2018.

Abstract

We define a set of universal, irreducible and essential set of material conditions for achieving basic human wellbeing, along with indicators and quantitative thresholds, which can be operationalized for societies based on local customs and preferences. We draw support for this decent living standard (DLS) from different accounts of basic justice, including the capability approach and basic needs. The DLS goes beyond existing multidimensional poverty indicators by comprehensively addressing living conditions and the means of social participation. The DLS offers a normative basis to develop minimum wage and reference budgets, and to assess the environmental impacts, such as climate change, of eradicating poverty.

Keywords: Decent living; Fair wage; Human development; Human wellbeing; Multidimensional Poverty; Reference budget.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decent living standards (DLS): hierarchy of material requirements and their derivation. We use the language of Doyal and Gough (1991) for basic needs and Nussbaum (2000) for central capabilities to define physical and social wellbeing, for which the DLS serve as prerequisites

References

    1. Alkire S. Dimensions of human development. World Development. 2002;30(2):181–205. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7. - DOI
    1. Alkire S, Santos ME. Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development. 2014;59:251–274. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026. - DOI
    1. Anker R. Poverty lines around the world: A new methodology and internationally comparable estimates. International Labor Review. 2006;145(4):279–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2006.tb00036.x. - DOI
    1. Blake M. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2001;30(3):257–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.x. - DOI
    1. Boelhouwer J. Quality of life and living conditions in the Netherlands. Social Indicators Research. 2002;58(1-3):113–138. doi: 10.1023/A:1015779732321. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources