Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 21:10:1605-1618.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S151552. eCollection 2018.

Optimal management of resected gastric cancer

Affiliations
Review

Optimal management of resected gastric cancer

Riccardo Giampieri et al. Cancer Manag Res. .

Abstract

Although advances in medical treatment for gastric cancer (GC) have been made, surgery remains the mainstay of cure for patients with localized disease. Improvement in surgical modalities leads to increased chance of cure for resected patients, but a non-negligible number of patients eventually relapse. On this basis, it has been hypothesized that the addition of complementary systemic or local treatments (such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy) could help in improving patients' survival by reducing the risk of recurrence. Several studies have tried to identify the best approach in localized GC: some of them have assessed the role of perioperative chemotherapy [CT] with different drug combinations, while others have focused on the benefit obtained by addition of radiotherapy, whose role is still under investigation. In particular, the role of chemoradiotherapy, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, is still uncertain. In the last few years, several clinicopathological and molecular factors have been investigated and identified as potential prognostic markers in GC. Many of these factors could have influenced the outcome of patients receiving combined treatments in the abovementioned studies. Patients have not been generally distinguished by the site of disease (esophageal, gastric and junctional cancers) and surgical approach, making data difficult to be interpreted. The purpose of this review was to shed light on these highly controversial topics.

Keywords: adjuvant; chemotherapy; gastric cancer; neoadjuvant; prognostic factors; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN 2012: Cancer fact sheet. [Accessed May 10, 2018]. Available from: http://www.iacr.com.fr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=101&....
    1. Liu D, Lu M, Li J, et al. The patterns and timing of recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer in China. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liang Y, Ding X, Wang X, et al. Prognostic value of surgical margin status in gastric cancer patients. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(9):678–684. - PubMed
    1. Aurello P, Magistri P, Nigri G, et al. Surgical management of microscopic positive resection margin after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review of gastric R1 management. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(11):6283–6288. - PubMed
    1. Zu H, Wang F, Ma Y, Xue Y. Stage-stratified analysis of prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54502. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources