Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 25:31:127.
doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.127. eCollection 2017.

Important considerations in calculating and reporting of sample size in randomized controlled trials

Ameneh Ebrahim Valojerdi  1 , Kiarash Tanha  1 , Leila Janani  1
Affiliations

Important considerations in calculating and reporting of sample size in randomized controlled trials

Ameneh Ebrahim Valojerdi et al. Med J Islam Repub Iran. .

Abstract

Background: The calculation of the sample size is one of the most important steps in designing a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is drawing the attention of researchers to the importance of calculating and reporting the sample size in randomized controlled trials. Methods: We reviewed related literature and guidelines and discussed some important issues in sample size calculation and reporting in randomized controlled trials. Conclusion: The calculation of the sample size is one of the most important steps in designing a randomized controlled trial. According to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guideline and other standard guidelines for designing and reporting of RCTs, sample size calculations should be reported and justified in all published RCTs. Because sample size calculations are prone to bias and because of the high ethical and financial costs related to conducting an RCT, we recommend involving a biostatistician at the designing stage of the study and to ask for statistical advice for sample size calculations.

Keywords: Post hoc power; Randomized controlled trials (RCTs); Sample size.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(8):536–42. - PubMed
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: is blinding necessary? ‎Contemp Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12. - PubMed
    1. Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu LM, Chan AW, Altman DG. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2010;340:c723.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maggard MA, O'connell JB, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Ko CY. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly? Surgery. 2003;134(2):275–9. - PubMed
    1. Lachin JM, Marks JW, Schoenfield LJ, Tyor MP, Bennett PH, Grundy SM. et al. Design and methodological considerations in the National Cooperative Gallstone Study: A multicenter controlled trial ‎Contemp Clin. Trials. 1981;2(3):177–229. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources