Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 24;1(1):24-29.
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.4. eCollection 2017 Feb.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

P N Hiep et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has theoretical advantages over other approaches.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of colorectal cancers operated on by NOTES (transanally for rectal tumours, transvaginally for sigmoid tumours) between December 2013 and December 2015, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Eligibility criteria included ASA fitness grade I-III, BMI below 25 kg/m2 and TNM stage T3 N0 M0. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or distant metastasis. The anastomosis was either handsewn or performed mechanically.

Results: Sixteen patients were operated on by a transanal and four by a transvaginal approach. There were ten men and ten women, with a mean(s.d.) age of 55·6(12·1) years. Mean BMI was 22·4(2·6) kg/m2. Four anterior, 11 low anterior and five intersphincteric resections were performed for 16 rectal and four low sigmoid tumours. The mean duration of surgery was 258(11) min. No conversion to laparotomy was needed, and there were no deaths. Five patients required additional ports, for intraoperative bleeding (1), suture of an intraoperative urethral injury with covering ileostomy (1) and difficulty in dissection (3). One patient had an anastomotic leak requiring transanal closure and ileostomy on day 7. Both ileostomies were closed after 2 months. The mean hospital stay was 6·4(1·8) days. All resections were R0.

Conclusion: In carefully selected patients NOTES for colorectal cancer resection was feasible and effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mucosal dissection. a Purse‐string occlusion of the rectum (arrow) and b mucosal incision (arrow). Traction on the purse‐string facilitates the mucosal incision
Figure 2
Figure 2
SILS™ Port inserted into anus
Figure 3
Figure 3
Inferior mesenteric artery ligated with a Hem‐o‐lok® clip
Figure 4
Figure 4
SILS™ Port inserted into vagina

References

    1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA et al Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 114–117. - PubMed
    1. Rao GV, Reddy DN, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008; 18: 361–370. - PubMed
    1. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 823–826. - PubMed
    1. Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 2016; 18: 19–36. - PubMed
    1. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J et al; TaTME Registry Collaborative. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 2016; [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed